Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of counties in Delaware

List of counties in Delaware
This is one of the shorter lists to appear on these pages, containing just three items. That said, it is useful (pulls together information not otherwise available in one place), comprehensive (includes all current counties), factually accurate (with references), stable (unless Delaware dramatically reorganises its local goverment), uncontroversial (no disputes) and well-constructed (clearly laid out); the lead explains the historical context, and the headings are approriate; and the maps are all the quick-loading SVG versions. Tom pw (talk) 10:18, 18 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Oppose. It's fine as far as it goes, but with only three members I don't believe that it "covers a topic that lends itself to list format". Given that the lead considerably outweighs the "list" portion of the article, I would suggest that it be renamed just to Counties in Delaware. It also needs inline citations for the references. --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 16:52, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The lead is no longer than List of counties in Kentucky. The only reasons it seems to outweight the main list is because of the low number of counties. Also, a summary table of information on counties in a state is most definately somethign which "lends itself to list format". (I've also dealt with teh inlien citations issue). Tom pw (talk) (review) 12:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Minor fixes This is real close, but some minor fixes are needed. I vehemently disagree with the above sentiment that this should not be listed for the fault of only having 3 items.  It substantially follows the same format as the List of counties in Kentucky (already featured) and the likely-to-be-soon-featured List of parishes in Louisiana.  Once a prototype has been established for a group of very similar articles, I see no compelling reason to deviate from that prototype merely because one of the members of the group happens to only have 3 counties.  That all having been said, minor fixes are needed:
 * Inline citations need to be put in the lead. Normally, where information in the lead is repeated elsewhere, it is unneccary to provide inline citations in the lead.  HOWEVER, this article has a lead that makes assertions of fact that are not directly referenced to anything, and that needs to be corrected.  The Kentucky article uses inline citations in the lead, and this one should too.
 * ✅ (At least, I think so) Tom pw (talk) (review) 12:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * External links in list: Move to external links section at the end.
 * ✅} Tom pw (talk) (review) 12:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Beyond that, it looks great. Make the fixes, and I will support it.--Jayron32| talk | contribs  19:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Support. Looks fine now.  Just one question: Why is Whorekill district wikilinked but New Castle district not?  If one deserves an article, surely both do? --Jayron32| talk | contribs  18:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * ✅ (Because New Castle was an original county). Tom pw (talk) (review) 19:51, 26 April 2007 (UTC)