Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of counties in Florida/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 01:29, 24 February 2010.

List of counties in Florida

 * Nominator(s):  Jujutacular  T · C 02:34, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel that it meets criteria. I have greatly expanded it over the last week or so.  Jujutacular  T · C 02:34, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This is a WikiCup nomination. To the nominator: if you do not intend to submit this article at the WikiCup, feel free to remove this notice. Mm40 (talk) 14:04, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment - I haven't really taken an expansive look at the article but the References could use a little bit of organising, like for example Black Eyed Peas discography. Afro  ( Its More Than a Feeling ) - Afkatk 15:14, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Done, using Black Eyed Peas discography as an example. Thanks for that.  Jujutacular  T · C 16:16, 22 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment I hate to do this to you, but all the images (including those in countyrow) need better alt text. The lead image should describe the shape of the state and describe general trends, such as the larger counties tend to be in the center. For the highlighted maps, describe the location ("high on the panhandle"), the size, and maybe the shape. See List of counties in New Jersey for an example. Also, be sure to exclude "in red" per WP:ALT. For other things, the main table is centered while the other two aren't, retrieval dates are in different formats (YYYY-MM-DD vs. Month day, year), and EPA should be spelled out in ref 5. Mm40 (talk) 01:36, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Done.  Jujutacular  T · C 20:14, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Closing note I have archived this nomination as unsuccessful, as more than a month has passed since this FLC was submitted, there is no consensus to promote and the length of FLC has put off reviewers. Unfortunately, I have had to fail several old, stale FLCs because of this. Feel free to re-submit this FLC in 5 or 6 days after ensuring that the previous issues have been resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.