Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of counties in Wyoming

List of counties in Wyoming
This is closely modelled on similar Featured Lists. It is useful (pulls together information not otherwise available in one place), comprehensive (includes all current counties), factually accurate (with references), stable (assumeing Wyoming doesn't change the county boundries), uncontroversial (no disputes) and well-constructed (clearly laid out); the lead gives background information, and the headings and TOC are appropriate; and images are all the quick-loading SVG versions. Tom pw (talk) (review) 19:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The area and population columns don't sort properly. Pepsidrinka 19:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It does now. Thanks for pointing this out. Tom pw (talk) (review) 20:28, 20 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Support As the main contributor, I can't refuse the urge to support. Thanks, Tompw, for your edits and this nomination. I don't know about you, Tom, but I modelled this list to List of counties in Arizona. ;) -- Crzycheetah 20:35, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * ... serves me right for copying a previous nomination of mine. Changed it now. Tom pw (talk) (review) 20:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Support - though it would be useful where possible (as suggested in the List of counties Arizona nomination) to have birth + death dates for the people counties are named after. Geraldk 23:06, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak support, there's a lot of redlinks in the etymology, but I can look past it. Wizardman  15:25, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * This is a list of counties and all counties have blue links. I want to remove these remaining redlinks because I think that they are not notable enough to have their own articles. Any thoughts? -- Crzycheetah 20:01, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Just as high quality as similar, already featured, lists. Acdixon 14:44, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Support, looks fine to me. -- Phoenix2  (holla)
 * Support - Appears to meet the criteria and it looks goog to me. Lara  ♥Love  15:26, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Support - Meets criteria, definitely looks good. --Raime 20:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC)