Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of countries with nuclear weapons

List of countries with nuclear weapons
Comprehensive, useful and well organised. Most of the comments in the talk pages seem to have been addressed. - Ian &equiv; talk 15:04, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. This is really a pretty remarkable article in general; I've never seen any other resource (on the internet or elsewhere) with such a comprehensive international coverage (I say this as an academic researcher in the history of nuclear weapons). What it lacks in a few spots (some typos, some entries not filled out very well, etc.), it makes up for with its breadth and large amount of external links as references. --Fastfission 16:54, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
 * This is excellent - I will support it when it has some references. It could also do with some more images - e.g. the first atomic bomb tests of each nation.  An easy win is to use the ISO country code templates  (e.g. 🇺🇸) which automatically introduces dinky flag images.-- ALoan (Talk) 20:11, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I count 26 references plus 4 URL's under external links. That's more than almost any other FL.    I'll add the flag's as you suggest and see what it looks like. - Ian &equiv; talk 01:06, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Flags added - Ian &equiv; talk 01:46, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Great - I hope everyone agrees that this looks better. Re references, I meant (as User:Nichalp indicates) that there needs to be a references section where the references are all drawn together. -- ALoan (Talk) 11:03, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Support -- ALoan (Talk) 11:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Support Object – Its really informative and well done BUT the references are not correctly formatted. Please refer to the Australia article for the correct rendering of the inline references. Will support only after that. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  07:38, July 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking care of the obj. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  19:41, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * References now moved into new section. I also merged the two Japan paras into one but in hindsight am unsure if that was correct.  Feel free to split them again. It's a top article and kudos to those who wrote it. I just hope I haven't mashed it up too much. -- Ian &equiv; talk 10:27, 2 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Support. If it weren't for the title, I think you'd have a good chance with this on the main FA. --  user:zanimum
 * Support amazingly comprehensive - well done --Sophitus 22:28, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support, great list. --Spangineer (háblame)  11:18, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support One of the best lists I've seen come through here. Dsmdgold 15:33, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. No objection. -- Darwinek 08:30, 9 August 2005 (UTC)