Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries at Brabourne Stadium/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 18:42, 25 April 2011.

List of international cricket centuries at Brabourne Stadium

 * Nominator(s): Around The Globe  सत्यमेव जयते 09:53, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because the article is based on similar featured lists such as [. I think the article covers all aspects of the topic and is ready FL status. [[User:AroundTheGlobe| Around The Globe ]] सत्यमेव जयते 09:53, 8 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Support all my issues with the article have been resolved, nice work.  Harrias  talk 13:02, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments –
 * "and has played host to Ranji Trophy matches, Indian Premier matches, as well as being a Test, One Day International and Twenty20 International venue." The flow of this from beginning to end isn't as good as it could be. Try removing the comma after "Ranji Trophy matches" and the parenthetical bit, then put "and" in there. That seems like the simplest thing to do to fix this.
 * Changed per suggestion. Around The Globe  सत्यमेव जयते 05:34, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The publisher of reference 4 (Indian Express) should be italicized since it's a printed publication.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 01:26, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. Around The Globe  सत्यमेव जयते 05:34, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Basic question Is "List of international cricket centuries at " a useful/encyclopedia-worthy topic of discussion? As a counter-example, would "List of hat-tricks scored at Anfield" be a encyclopedic topic? Put in another way, what is to be gained by arranging 100s stadium-wise?—indopug (talk) 07:52, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * IMHO, it is encyclopaedic. For wikiusers interested in cricket, it goes to show historic info of major venues as well as of major cricketers (such as List of international cricket centuries by David Gower - a one of the many FL's on the topic). Withregards to Anfield, according to me it would depend on whether its a major international football venue - and whether a hat-trick is as big (eg. there has been only 1 ODI hat-trick, none in tests at the Brabourne hence it would not qualify for a wiki list article) - Im not active on WP Football so would not know much abt tht.  Around The Globe  सत्यमेव जयते 08:15, 23 March 2011 (UTC)


 * This article talks about 17 Ranji finals whereas the main Brabourne article has it as 16. From a quick check, 17 seems to be the correct figure. Please confirm anyway. Tintin 13:18, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Per Cricketarchive.com - 1938, 1942, 1944, 1945, 1949, 1952, 1959, 1960, 1962, 1964, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 2008 (plate group final). Thanks for the corrections.  Around The Globe  सत्यमेव जयते 06:21, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Support Courcelles 20:15, 24 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment: I find this sentence, at the end of the first paragraph, a bit confusing - The stadium hosted five matches including the final of the ICC Champions Trophy in 2006. Why is this mentioned? The lines before this mention the first Test, ODI and T20I matches which are obviously important events for the ground. What is special about these five matches that justifies mentioning them alongside the inaugural matches? If there's something important about them (I'm guessing because they were champions trophy matches) make the reason clear, and include the match format as well for clarity. Other than that, the article looks good to me. Chamal T •C 14:42, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Does this work now? Around The Globe  सत्यमेव जयते 17:21, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks ok. Support. Chamal T •C 11:41, 22 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Support looks good to me. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:23, 24 April 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.