Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries at the Green Park Stadium/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC).

List of international cricket centuries at the Green Park Stadium

 * Nominator(s): &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 08:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Continuing my obsession towards cricket lists, I'd like to nominate this for FLC. I've modeled this based on the existing FLs. This is my first FLC in three months, so I'd like to have a thorough review. Thanks, &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 08:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Quick comments –
 * "India's Gundappa Viswanath and Mohammed Azharuddin had scored the most centuries at the venue with three each." "had" → "have"?
 * "As of February 2016, 35 Test centuries have been scored at the stadium." The list and lead photo caption both give a figure of 32 centuries.
 * In the Azharuddin photo caption, "had" can be removed. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 02:14, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Fixed all. Thanks &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 07:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Oppose Really poorly written article with non reliable sources. 213.205.251.56 (talk) 23:21, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Struck vote of a vandal only IP which has been blocked. Cowlibob (talk) 22:32, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The page has been constantly vandalised by a sock. &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 10:13, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * This page, or the list? This page has been edited by an anonymous editor four times, most of that edit warring within a short period of time. Disruptive, but not at "protect the nomination" levels — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:10, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I meant this page. Just wanted to leave a note - it's a vandal (possibly a sock). &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 15:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Agree. Feel free to revert the vandal IP. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:23, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * - The edits are becoming very disruptive. &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 09:02, 16 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Some facts in the lead need "As of".
 * "The record for the highest score by an overseas player" --> "The record for the highest ODI score by an overseas player"
 * "is the highest score by a batsman at this ground" --> "is the highest ODI score by a batsman at this ground"

Good work! Bharatiya 29  14:30, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Fixed all. Thanks! &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 16:31, 14 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Support Bharatiya  29  15:51, 17 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:54, 23 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Support meets the criteria, great work. NapHit (talk) 19:47, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Source review – I'll recuse myself from closing the list to provide a needed source check. All of the references appear reliable, work properly, and are well-formatted. Spot-checks of some citations (numbers 4, 8, 12, 19, and 31) revealed no issues with verification or close paraphrasing. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 20:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * - note that we decided that you can still close nominations if you give a source review (assuming you feel comfortable with it); that said, I'll close it while I'm here. -- Pres N  01:09, 27 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.