Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Brian Lara/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 03:36, 28 February 2010.

List of international cricket centuries by Brian Lara

 * Nominator(s): ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 12:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Another cricket centuries list, following the style of my previous FLC's and other already existing lists. Looking forward to your comments and suggestions. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 12:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This is a WikiCup nomination. To the nominator: if you do not intend to submit this article at the WikiCup, feel free to remove this notice. Mm40 (talk) 12:44, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is. Sorry, I didn't know I was supposed to mention that. I suppose I should check out the talk pages more often. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 12:47, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Everything else looks fine to me, another nice centuries list, well done. Harrias (talk) 16:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your suggestions. I've made some changes to the article. What do you think? I'd also appreciate your views on the numbers issue. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 01:37, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Yeah, on reading that section (which I've read many times, but missed that clause!) I'm happy with your numbers, honestly I prefer like that anyway! Harrias (talk) 18:15, 15 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Support great work. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments –
 * "His accomplishments with the bat saw him being chosen as the...". Tiny bit of wordiness that can easily be removed. I don't even think it needs a replacement word.
 * Done


 * "as well one of the Wisden Cricketers of the Year in 1995." Missing "as" after "well".
 * Done


 * Should general references be placed before specific?  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 01:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Done: This is how I have done it in most of my articles, but I don't see a problem with it either way. Thanks for your suggestions. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 01:25, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Support – Another very good cricket list.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 03:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - all looks good to me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.