Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at M. Chinnaswamy Stadium/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by  Pres N  14:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC).

List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at M. Chinnaswamy Stadium

 * Nominator(s): — Ssven2  Speak 2 me  11:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)''

My second cricket-related featured list. Constructive comments are most welcome. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 11:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

You already have one list here that has yet to receive any support. You should only nominate a second list when your current one has enough support. NapHit (talk) 11:46, 26 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Yeah, you should've been aware of this one: "Users should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed." The other list is yet to be reviewed by a single editor. &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 11:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Oops! Forgot about that! Should I withdraw for now? — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 11:54, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd say so, as soon as you're other lists gets enough supports, then it shouldn't be a problem renominating it! NapHit (talk) 12:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I request withdrawal of my nomination. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 12:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Apologies for striking your withdrawal. Your other list has now a support, and that it does not need to be withdrawn. --  Frankie talk 14:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * FrB.TG, it's good that you reviewed the other list, but one support is still a thin-line case. &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 15:08, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Not going to close this one, since I never got around to it and your other nom now has ~2.5 supports, but in the future: the rule of thumb for a second nomination is that your first has at least three substantive reviews ending in supports, and no ongoing reviews for a few days minimum. One support really isn't enough. -- Pres N  19:43, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Well, I guess I am going to close this one- after almost 2 months without a support, I'm going to have to close this as not passed. Feel free to renominate, and note that the easiest way to get people to review your nomination is to review theirs first. -- Pres N  14:04, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.