Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Chaminda Vaas/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by 23:49, 13 March 2013 (UTC).

List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Chaminda Vaas

 * Nominator(s): Chamal T •C 02:30, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Continuing the cricket offensive on FLC, I'd like to nominate List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Chaminda Vaas for consideration. I've been taking my time with this, but I think the article meets the standards and is ready to be reviewed. This is my first FLC in more than two years, so please feel free to give it a thorough review. Chamal T •C 02:30, 2 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Support Nothing raised my attention when I was reading the article. However I am not an expert in cricket. Ruslik_ Zero 17:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Support – Nice work with the article. &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  07:02, 3 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Support – meets the standards. Zia Khan 15:40, 3 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments from  Harrias  talk
 * Per MOS:NUM, when comparing two numbers they should be in the same format, so "with 12 in Tests and four in One Day Internationals" should be either 12 and 4 or twelve and four.
 * Cricinfo and CricketArchive both list him as a fast-medium, and given that has a distinct meaning from fast bowler, I would change "As a left arm fast bowler, he was accurate.." to "As a left-arm fast-medium bowler, he was accurate.."
 * Minor point, but I would prefer a comma the number in "..accumulated 1155 Test wickets.." (making it 1,155) but it's only a personal preference really, so I'll leave it up to you.
 * "..the highest number of wickets he had taken in a single match." Should be "has" not "had".
 * Support All in all, a very well written list, and my points above are so minor that I'm happy to support the article even before the requested tweaks are made.  Harrias  talk 11:23, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review and support. I have made the changes you suggested. Chamal T •C 11:59, 3 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment – Note 1 has too much punctuation in the first sentence. Try removing the period after "guessing". Giants2008  ( Talk ) 21:31, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Done. I tried to think of a way to reword it, but all my ideas make the note even longer. If you have a suggestion, please let me know. Chamal T •C 03:08, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.