Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Danish Kaneria/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by Crisco 1492 12:22, 30 March 2015.

List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Danish Kaneria

 * Nominator(s): Vibhijain (talk), Khadar Khani (talk) 23:49, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

The list of Danish Kaneria's fifers was created by Vibhijain. I worked on the list and now I feel this is according to the FLC criteria. Appreciate your comments and suggestion. Regards, Khadar Khani (talk) 23:49, 25 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Oppose per criterion 3(b). The size of the parent article hovers around 4.3k chars &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 09:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * the parent article is now over 7.5k characters (over 1250 words). I think your concern is addressed! --Khadar Khani (talk) 16:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I think it still needs expansion. Though others might have different opinions, my rule-of-thumb is 12k chars. &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 16:58, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, I'll try to expand this a little more. --Khadar Khani (talk) 17:02, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Parent article's size is now 12k chars! --Khadar Khani (talk) 01:03, 2 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment:
 * "As of 2015, he is seventh in the list of five-wicket haul takers for Pakistan, all formats of the game combined." --> "As of 2015, he is seventh in the list of five-wicket haul takers for Pakistan in all formats of the game combined."
 * Done. --Khadar Khani (talk) 16:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Use the Template:As of for the above sentence.
 * Stats for the list change with time, so no need of this. --Khadar Khani (talk) 16:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I would center align the values for the Inn, Overs, Runs, Wkts, Econ, and Result columns for aesthetic reasons.
 * This is for consistency reason since the plainrowheaders' rowscopes align to the left. --Khadar Khani (talk) 16:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Need to add column scopes to the table per WP:ACCESS
 * Done. --Khadar Khani (talk) 16:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Link all instances of ESPNcricinfo in your references.
 * No need of this, the first one is already linked. --Khadar Khani (talk) 16:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't put rowscopes in the middle of a row as this will confuse screen readers. They should ideally be put at the beginning of a row.
 * Yes, they should be in the beginning but in this case the list is about "five-wicket hauls", so I rowscoped the corresponding one. --Khadar Khani (talk) 16:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, I disagree with Vensatry that this is a 3(b) violation. This list is long enough that it would be awkward to merge it back into the parent article. Plus, Chaminda Vaas has only 16 five wicket hauls, one more than Danish Kaneria, and it is a featured list.  Black hole78  talk 21:40, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * thanks for the review, I'll do your list ASAP! --Khadar Khani (talk) 16:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * It's not about the length of the list, but about the size of the parent article. And yes, the Chaminda Vaas list shouldn't have been promoted. Nevertheless, the issue is now resolved as the parent article has been expanded. &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 11:59, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * have you had a chance to have another look at this list? Harrias talk 18:59, 26 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Support Not much to say about this one. I've made some consistency fixes to the references, but otherwise it is a pretty solid list. Nice work. Harrias talk 20:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the support! --Khadar Khani (talk) 21:40, 18 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Support - can't see any issues -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:02, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Sadly there's been little interest in this nomination. It's of the age where it's better to archive and start anew. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.