Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Shakib Al Hasan/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 01:43, 18 January 2016 (UTC).

List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Shakib Al Hasan

 * Nominator(s):Aftabuzzaman, &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 18:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

My first fifers-list (of a player's) in a long time. created the basic article. I expanded the lead and tidied up the table a bit. &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 18:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Support Great work. NapHit (talk) 14:27, 23 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:13, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Comments Fixed all, thanks for the comments. As for the last comment, I have problems with comma splice :). &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 08:58, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * "With 15 five-wicket hauls across all formats of the game" => "With 15 five-wicket hauls across all formats of international cricket", as currently it implies that these are the only fifers he's ever taken in any cricket match at all
 * "He ended the year with three more five-wicket hauls—coming in consecutive innings—against South Africa and Sri Lanka." => "He ended the year with three more five-wicket hauls, which came in consecutive innings against South Africa and Sri Lanka."
 * "ODI" is introduced in the final paragraph of the lead but it has not been mentioned before and the abbreviation is not explained or linked. It should probably be written out in full here, although obviously it is OK to then use the abbreviation in the next sentence.
 * "He took five wickets for 47 runs in the match which his team won by 145 runs" => "He took five wickets for 47 runs in the match, which his team won by 145 runs" - a bit picky but there you go ;-)
 * That's all I can spot -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:58, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Support - all looks good now == ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:45, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Support. Relentlessly (talk) 15:24, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 22:07, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.