Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of largest cities in Brazil

List of largest cities in Brazil
Is a good list. Compared with others, is one of the best ones. Felipe C.S ( talk ) 17:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Some Comments:
 * Separate the two columns like in List of countries by Human Development Index. It is neater.
 * Make it clear in the lead that This is a list of cities in Brazil by population.
 * Put the flags next to the cities instead of the ranks.
 * Explain what the flags represent (flags of the cities or the states).
 * You don't need to explain that This does not intend to attend all Brazilian cities.... It's clear that the section represent the 100 Most populous cities. And also you don't need to apologize: which cannot be done in the main list due to its large size, 89 kb. I think that this paragraph is useless. Instead, clarify in the lead that the list is based on the population of the município where the city is located, rather than its urban sprawl, and put a link to List of cities in Brazil in the lead or at the end. Otherwise I don't that these two paragraphs have much to offer.
 * What does the "cities by HDI" have to do with "List of largest cities in Brazil"?
 * The gallery is also irrelevant in this list. I prefer if it would be removed.
 * I would suggest to separate city and state into two columns, but I'm not sure about it.

Anyway, great work. CG 19:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

--Polaron | Talk 13:44, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose
 * A single column series is enough, see FL List of United States cities by population,make it sortable
 * Don't bold the cities' names (besides, they will end up in different cells)
 * Consider renaming.
 * Separate state and city.if you put flag (which I recommend you don't), put them with the state
 * titles the section "Top 100 most populous cities," "most" should not be capitalized
 * Human development index is totally irrelevant to this list.
 * Move the gallery so it goes down the side of the reformatted table
 * Haven't review the text content for now, since the table has too many issues anyway. Circeus 21:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Much improved! Part 2 of the review:
 * Add some sources about the definition stuff in the lead
 * Link the cities and states mentioned there.
 * Consider adding an image for the lead. Maybe a map of the states colored according to the number of cities in them? People at the Graphic Lab can probably help.
 * Integrate "IBGE estimates of 2006" in the section text.
 * In the first table, "Santa Catarina," "Serra" and "Paraná" are links to disambiguation pages. There might be more.
 * Try using Template-based content notes (see Verbascum thapsus for an example) under "metropolitan areas", or use the tags directly
 * Consider keeping only one link per state per table.
 * If possible, add something about how IBGE defines a metropolitan region.
 * Circeus 16:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed the disambig issue. --Golbez 21:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose: Population numbers should commas, not periods (to seperate thousands) (See Manual of Style (dates and numbers) / WP:WIAFL #2) Tom pw  (talk) (review) 17:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. --Golbez 21:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - I think I've fixed all of the problems above. I don't know if it's featured material, and there's one contradiction (it says 15 RMs are recognized, but lists 28), but at least the problems mentioned above are fixed, except maybe the article title. --Golbez 12:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I've done all I can, I'm not familiar enough with the subject to know the sources or what not. We'll have to wait for the nominator to come back. =p --Golbez 21:04, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose
 * There are many unsourced assertions regarding how urban and rural areas are classified. Also some statistical assertions in the introductory text for the metropolitan areas section is unsourced.
 * The metropolitan area figures cannot be found in the linked source. Please link to the proper source for the figures.
 * Why is RIDE (Brasilia city region) not included in the metropolitan area list? While not officially a RM, it should at least be mentioned why.
 * (not critical) Is there an article explaining how Regiao Metropolitana are delineated? If not, a short statement in the list might be useful.