Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of largest suspension bridges/archive2

List of largest suspension bridges
This is a resubmission. The previous nomination is at Featured list candidates/List of largest suspension bridges/archive1. I have tried to address the previous concerns. Almost all photos have been sourced (still working on tracking down a few, if these are a problem, I will just remove them and replace them with a link to an external photo). None of the bridges listed have red links. Several new photos have been added. All ranks now link to external references. Most are the homepages of the bridges. Bridges without homepages link to either structurae.de or bridgemeister.com. Most bridges missing photos on Wikipedia have links to external photos. Note that it is customary to call bridges with the longest main span the "largest" bridge.-- Samuel Wantman 08:58, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Greatly improved. &mdash; Nightst a  llion  (?) Seen this already? 11:53, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Why a list of the top 105? Why not 104 or 106? Seems kind of arbitrary. Pepsidrinka 08:17, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Many of the original references for this list had 100 bridges listed. Several more have been added mostly because they were finished recently, and there was one or two that were found to be missing from the original sources.  I just discovered another one, completed in 2000, so now there are 106.  So I have accurate information for the top 109 bridges.  I considered stopping at 100, but 101 is historically significant; 104 is the largest of its type; 105 had a picture; and  both 105 and 106 already had small articles written about them.  I will probably add the three more bridges that I have information about, eventually.  I hope the list gets longer. I would like it to have every bridge larger than the Union Bridge with a central span of 137 meters.  So there is no magic number.  Do you think there should be? -- Samuel Wantman 09:30, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I think that a list of the top 100 would be best, unless the Union Bridge you mentioned is some sort of standard when it comes to bridges. Pepsidrinka 04:25, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 100 seems just as arbitrary as 106 or 109 or 200 or 500. Why not include any information that is correct and verifiable? -- Samuel Wantman 01:03, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think we need to limit it to 100. Eventually the list will grow when new bridges are built, I don't think we need to drop the lowest ones off when that happens. (Do giant bridges ever get destroyed?, would they still be on the list?) Rmhermen 20:24, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * There are a few bridges that have collapsed or been replaced including a few that at one time were the largest spans in the world. They are not on this list, but I hope to add these to a new section.  I'm also considering adding a list of notable bridges that have shorter spans, and other record holding bridges (there is some discussion about this on the talk page). -- Samuel Wantman 02:31, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Support - persitent :) Renata 20:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Support, looks good. VegaDark 05:54, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Support - looks excellent, very informative. Suicidalhamster 15:12, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Tobyk777 01:44, 11 May 2006 (UTC)