Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of local nature reserves in Berkshire/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC).

List of local nature reserves in Berkshire

 * Nominator(s): Dudley Miles (talk) 20:22, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

This is the latest in my nominations of lists of Local Nature Reserves and is in the same format as FLs such as Kent and Suffolk. Dudley Miles (talk) 20:22, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

No issues. Sources are reliable for what they're used for and images are free. A few source checks did not uncover any problems. buidhe 00:15, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Source and image reviews —pass
 * Drive-by comment - the two FLs which you link above have leads of over 1500 characters, whereas this one is only 900, which seems very short. Can it be beefed up a bit.......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Done. Added information about the county. Dudley Miles (talk) 13:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Support. - Dank (push to talk) 19:36, 13 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Support - I guess the flora thing makes sense now that you have explained it -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:30, 5 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment
 * Only one issue for me, there are repeated linking of the same borough like Workingham, Bracknell Forest etc. Link once per MOS:OVERLINK and merge the row of brorough if repeated in the consecutive rows. Like the first two site are in Workingham, so merge both row of brorough into one. Otherwise the article looks fine to me. Dey subrata (talk) 12:44, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review . The reason for the repeated links is that reviewers of previous lists have advised that links should be repeated in sortable lists as sorting on area, for example, would put different links first in the list. Dudley Miles (talk) 15:00, 27 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Well,am satisfied..references look ok. I support the nom. All the best. Dey subrata (talk) 18:55, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoted. -- Pres N  18:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.