Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of mammals of Korea

List of mammals of Korea
Self-nom. I believe this now meets all of the specified criteria, so am listing it here. If I'm wrong, please sound off and I'll do my best to fix it up. See also: peer review page. -- Visviva 09:15, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Very comprehensive and well-referenced list. Excellent work on dealing with the issues raised on the peer review.  Michaelas10   (Talk)   19:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. The sources should not be mentioned in the lead as this doesn't summarize the topic. See WP:LEAD.  Michaelas10   (Talk)   09:36, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmm... I agree, actually, but including the references in the lead actually seems to be standard practice in FLs (which is why I followed it here). See, for example, List of dragonfly species recorded in Britain, List of Kansas birds, and various other featured lists of animals.  I think the reason for this is that the list needs to make its membership criteria clear in the lead, and doing so generally requires mentioning the references.  -- Visviva 13:27, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Update: have trimmed this part of the lead to what I think are the bare essentials (2 sentences).  Hope that meets any objections. -- Visviva 13:09, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Renata 21:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. I have a friend here that is a birdwatcher and according to him Korean animals aren't as well-known as they should be. I'm sure there'll be a lot of "Sea of Japan" vs. "Sea of Korea" when it gets on the front page but it'll be worth it. Mithridates 12:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * support the images really help Hmains 05:41, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. My only slight qualm was actually regarding the (table) template rather than the list, but that's been taken care of. Great list.-- Wizardman 19:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)