Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of members of Stortinget 2001-2005/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted 20:51, 23 February 2008.

List of members of Stortinget 2001-2005
This is another "version" of List of members of Stortinget 2005-2009, whose nomination ended with an unanimous promotion to featured status after some issues had been adressed. To summarize it meets FL criteria 1a, b, c, d, e, f, 2a, b, c and 3. Punkmorten (talk) 17:11, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Further comments - I have a couple of minor concerns outstanding...
 * a) Not essential but I'd write stubs for the two members who don't have articles.
 * b) Is it worth wikilinking the constituencies?
 * c) Again may be my lack of understanding of Norwegian names but Karita Bekkemellem Orheim sorts by Bekkemellem not Orheim, Magnhild Meltveit Kleppa by Meltveit not Kleppa, May-Helen Molvær Grimstad by Molvær, not Grimstad.
 * d) What does "met in her place" mean?
 * Very nearly ready to support. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks
 * a) done - except for Kvakkestad whose bio was not available at the moment
 * b) I don't know... they could be linked once, but then that link won't always show up if you sort the columns by party or name. On the other hand, if all instances of the constituency are linked, that would be redundant...
 * c) fixed two of them, but I think Karita Bekkemellem Orheim should sort by Bekkemellem. Reason: She was born Karita Bekkemellem, then married Karita Bekkemellem Orheim but has now reverted to just Karita Bekkemellem.
 * d) to "meet" is to be present in a parliament session. When someone is away, the deputy meets in place of that person. Could be reworded?
 * Punkmorten (talk) 20:36, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem.
 * a) cool, not a major worry.
 * b) since the list is sortable I would link them all. I know there's an issue of redundancy as you point out but in general, sortable lists with repeated wikilinking is fine (in my opinion)!
 * c) I'll take your word for it!
 * d) Yes, I think a footnote or something similar for the non-expert (like me) if you don't mind.
 * The Rambling Man (talk) 13:55, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.