Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of municipalities in Rio Grande do Norte/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 22:08, 22 June 2012.

List of municipalities in Rio Grande do Norte

 * Nominator(s): Albacore (talk) 13:09, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because... it meets criteria, like all my other lists. Albacore (talk) 13:09, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * At least on my browser, the images on the right force the table down so there's a full page of whitespace. A possible solution is not enforce column/table widths, you really shouldn't need to anyway.
 * Removed the column and table widths.


 * Do we need two columns for area, or can they be combined, stacked on one another?
 * You can still have it sort by km, we have sort templates. --Golbez (talk) 13:49, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Honestly, that's a lot of work for a little difference. I think the list is fine the way it is. Albacore (talk) 21:54, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Now combined into one column. Albacore (talk) 04:24, 30 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm not entirely sure we need the coordinates, either; we have the map, and if someone needs the coordinates of the city center they can click through to the article, since they're all bluelinked. But I won't push for that, just offering it as a discussion possibility. --Golbez (talk) 16:49, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * There's three or four red links in the table, and having them really doesn't hurt anything. I wouldn't say they're essential, but they help. Albacore (talk) 04:33, 30 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Support NapHit (talk) 17:58, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Support suberb list.-- GoP T C N 16:50, 9 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Image review – No problems found with the photos. I only did a spot check on the maps, but they appear all to be the work of the same editor. I'll assume therefore, that they're all fine too.  Good raise  23:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)


 * 'Support The Rambling Man (talk) 16:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.