Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums of 1995/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by User:Scorpion0422 22:30, 2 December 2008.

List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums of 1995
I am submiting this list because I think its ready to achieve featured list status, Jaespinoza (talk) 19:37, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Support - another great list, good work and it meets WP:WIAFL.-- S R X  22:30, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Support Comment  "making her as the first Hispanic singer to accomplish this feat"—What feat? Dabomb87 (talk) 17:14, 16 November 2008 (UTC). Answer: Debuting at number one in the Billboard 200. Jaespinoza (talk) 21:47, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose It only has 5 distinct entries, streched out by date. If formated to actually be a list of albums with dates of being nuzmber one, it would be five lines long! Not suitable for a FL imo. If all the info can be attractively presented in 5 lines, needs a very good reason to be 52 lines, which i don't think it has. Should be merged into a decade long list.Yobmod (talk) 11:41, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Answer: Actually I am glad you bring this up. I will have the same issue with the list for 1993 (1 album), 1994 (3 albums) and with this one, I do not know if its better to make a list for the number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums of 1993, 1994 and 1995 altogether or something else. Any suggestion? Jaespinoza (talk) 17:54, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I would support if it were merged into a year range of contiguous years. With the individual years as redrects, it would save time and look better. I saw that other years are long enough to meritt seperate articles, but even they are not huge. Is it feaible to merge all of them into 3 or 5 year periods?Yobmod (talk) 09:38, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Answer:It is possible to merge 3 years on the same list, let me work on something, Jaespinoza (talk) 19:07, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Here is my proposition for the merged list: List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums of 1993, 1994 and 1995 Jaespinoza (talk) 02:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Slight oppose this list for now; weak support for merger. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 22:36, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums of 1993, 1994 and 1995, merged list. Jaespinoza (talk) 02:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Are you going to redirect this page to the 1993, 1994, 1995 list then? -- Scorpion 0422  02:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I need an opinion about that, the lists for 1993 and 1995 have all the refs for every week at number one, should I put those refs on the merged list so I can redirect them? Jaespinoza (talk) 03:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Just so I understand, you're problem is that each ref only covers one week, and most of these artists have been number one for more than a week, which could lead to a problem with over-citing? As well, if you are going to merge the pages, then this one should be withdrawn. I can close it tomorrow, if you like. -- Scorpion 0422  04:17, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The refs only cover 1 week each. I can place 150 refs in the merged list, but is that overciting? Jaespinoza (talk) 22:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.