Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of number-one albums from the 2000s (UK)/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 17:30, 15 September 2011.

List of number-one albums from the 2000s (UK)

 * Nominator(s): A Thousand Doors (talk &#124; contribs) 23:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

I have compared this article to its equivalent singles list, and I hope that this is of a similar quality. I feel that this list meets the FL criteria, and I welcome any comments about how it could be improved. Thanks very much! A Thousand Doors (talk &#124; contribs) 23:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Support, all of my concerns have been resolved. Passes WP:WIAFL. –Drilnoth (T/C) 19:02, 25 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Support but if you remove the overlinking in the references column, for example "The Official Charts Company" or "London". Do not link the latter one, as common city.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ Hey it's me I am dynamite 11:03, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Removed wikilinks to London. Thanks very much for the support! A Thousand Doors (talk &#124; contribs) 15:22, 21 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Support. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 23:47, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


 * What does  mean?  Why isn't it in the key?
 * The number next to each album shows that it is the nth album to reach number one, e.g. the 752 next to Don't Believe the Truth by Oasis shows that it is the 752nd album ever to top the UK Albums Chart. Putting it in the key would certainly be a good idea, I just can't think of any succinct way of describing it. Any suggestions?
 * Well, saying "nth album to top UK Albums Chart" is a good start! The Rambling Man (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. A Thousand Doors (talk &#124; contribs) 17:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Tables should use MOS:DTT as guidance for accessibility using row and col scopes.
 * Sorry, but I'm a bit confused - what do you mean by this?
 * For the benefit of WP:ACCESS, you should add !scope="col" in front of each column heading, and !scope="row" in front of each row heading. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * And what, in this article, would the row heading be? The number? Artist? Single name? Whichever one it is will look different from the other cells, which would be annoying for people using standard visual media. –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:07, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * It should be the element of the row that is considered the most significant. And using "plainrowheaders" in the table class should prevent it looking too different.  The Rambling Man (talk) 10:23, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * But which of those is most significant? They all seem more or less equally important to me. Anyways, I'll leave it up to the article nominator. –Drilnoth (T/C) 10:49, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Probably the album itself. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:16, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The album itself would make sense, since that's what's referenced in the article title. But there are ten "Album" headers in the list in total - do I add !scope="col" before each one, or only the top-most one? A Thousand Doors (talk &#124; contribs) 17:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not an expert but since the header has been repeated, I would imagine that yes, you'd need to repeat the scope parameter. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:25, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. A Thousand Doors (talk &#124; contribs) 20:38, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Support excellent work! Crystal Clear x3 15:19, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.