Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of roles and awards of Rachelle Ann Go/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC).

List of roles and awards of Rachelle Ann Go

 * Nominator(s): Pseud 14 (talk) 02:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

After recently expanding the main article of Filipino singer Rachelle Ann Go, here's her work and awards list which I have lumped into one article, tailored to FLs like List of roles and awards of Oscar Isaac and List of roles and awards of Catherine Zeta-Jones. Happy to address your comments and thanks to all who take the time to review the list. Pseud 14 (talk) 02:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments from ZooBlazer

 * for which she won the Myx Music Award for Favorite Mellow Video - I think this is missing a ref. The ref before mentions being nominated, but doesn't mention winning, while the following ref doesn't seem to mention the award at all.
 * As a note, the lead doesn't need to be cited if the information listed are in the table. This is Ref 57 in the awards table


 * earning the Awit Award for Best R&B Recording - Also seems to be missing a ref.
 * Same Ref 45 in the awards table


 * For the production, she won the Star Award for Revival Album of the Year, and garnered nominations for Female Recording Artist of the Year and Female Pop Artist of the Year at the 2009 ceremony. Another single from the album, "This Time I'll Be Sweeter", earned her a Best Mellow Video nomination at the 2010 Myx Music Awards - Same issue for all of this. If it's in ref #7, then my bad. That ref is only partially translating for me.
 * Ref 63 in the awards table. Ref 7 supports her "guest role" on Diva


 * She then became a mentor in the reality talent show Protégé: The Battle for the Big Break (2011) - Ditto as above.
 * Ref 26 on the television table


 * She won the BroadwayWorld Philippines Award for Best Actress in a Musical for the role - Ditto
 * Ref 49 on the awards table


 * For the show, she received the BroadwayWorld UK Award for Best Featured Actress in a New Production of a Musical - I don't see this in either of the following two refs.
 * Ref 50 on the awards table


 * winning Best Female Performance in a Long-Running West End Show at the BroadwayWorld UK Awards - Ref?
 * Ref 51


 * For her performance in the latter, Go won a BroadwayWorld UK Award for Best Actress in a New Production of a Musical. She has since reprised her roles in various productions and tours of Les Misérables (2019–2022) and Hamilton (2023–2024). Needs a ref or refs.
 * Ref 52 for the award, and Ref 38 to 41 for the last sentence in the lead.

Overall, it seems like a lot of stuff isn't cited in the body of the article, although I'm pretty sure at least some useful refs are in the tables below. --  Zoo Blazer  06:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * thanks for your review. Generally, anything mentioned/supported in the tables don't need to be cited in the lead. Awards, filmographies, discographies, and similar types of FLs such as this are examples (List of roles and awards of Oscar Isaac, List of roles and awards of Angeline Quinto, List of awards and nominations received by Anne Hathaway). Let me know if I missed a ref that doesn't support prose in the lead. Happy to revise otherwise. Pseud 14 (talk) 12:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Huh, that's the first I've heard of that, although I'm still relatively new to FLC. Happy to Support since you brought up all the refs that cover the info. --  Zoo Blazer  16:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * thanks for your support. I believe, similar to standard articles, list articles also conform to MOS:CITELEAD, where everything that is repeated in the body or tables don't need to be cited. As long as it is supported in the body, having citations in the lead section is optional, but is also allowed if it is a preference :) Pseud 14 (talk) 18:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments

 * "She signed with Viva Records and worked with producer Eugene Villaluz for her self-titled debut studio album" - "She signed with Viva Records and worked with producer Eugene Villaluz on her self-titled debut studio album" would be more natural English
 * Done


 * "received the MTV Pilipinas for Favorite Female Video." - surely the awards weren't simply called the "MTV Pilipinas", which was the name of the TV station? Surely they were called "MTV Pilipanas Awards" or similar?  The title of our article on the awards suggests so.....
 * You're right, the award is called "MTV Pilipinas Music Awards", but the wiki article for the specific award I think was improperly named. I've corrected it to MTV Pilipinas Music Award for Favorite Female Video


 * "starring as the titular fictional character." - I think just "starring as the titular character" is fine. I don't think we need to clarify that the titular character in a show about a mermaid is fictional :-)
 * Lol, this made me laugh. Very true. Revised.


 * In the awards table, "MTV Pilipinas Music Award" should be "MTV Pilipinas Music Awards"
 * Done


 * "at West End's Sondheim Theater in 2019" => "at the Sondheim Theatre in London's West End in 2019" (note the UK spelling of theatre)
 * Done. Also got a question, with proper nouns, if outside of the UK and they are written as Meralco Theater, should I retain that? Or as a matter of consistency use Theatre? (I would guess the British vs American variation only applies for usage as a common noun)
 * You would simply use whatever the actual name of the place is. So, if you were writing about New York you would use Hayes Theater because that's how it's spelt, but you would use Hudson Theatre because (for some reason) that's how that one is spelt -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clarifying. This makes perfect sense now. And thanks for your edits on the main article too. Pseud 14 (talk) 13:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)


 * That's it I think, great work as ever!! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:22, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking on the review ChrisTheDude. All comments actioned. Let me know if there's anything I might have missed. Pseud 14 (talk) 23:34, 17 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your support and your time in reviewing. Pseud 14 (talk) 13:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Hey man im josh
Source review: Passed
 * Reliable enough for the information being cited
 * Consistent date formatting
 * Consistent and proper reference formatting
 * Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
 * Spot checks on 10 sources match what they are being cited for

Review notes:
 * Note that my review does not include a review of the references to television episodes, as that's not a format that I'm familiar with or have evaluated before, so I'm assuming good faith in this instane.
 * Thanks for raising that. I believe it was in this similar nomination that a reviewer highlighted that we could use Template:Cite episode, which is also generally acceptable for information such as cast and personnel credits, episode titles, etc.


 * Refs 15 and 37 are the same
 * Thanks for catching this. Fixed


 * Refs 8 and 22 are the same
 * Also fixed. I don't know how I missed that too.


 * Ref 41 – Include |location=Abu Dhabi
 * Added


 * Refs 62 and 63 – Wikilink to News.ABS-CBN.com instead of ABS-CBNnews.com
 * Done


 * Ref 61 – Needs a url-access tag, similar to that of ref 42's
 * I believe the url-access tag is already in place.

That's what I've got. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your review Hey man im josh, and for looking into the references. All actioned. Let me know if I might have missed anything. Pseud 14 (talk) 17:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * gentle poke ;) Howdy! Just checking in if everything has been addressed satisfactorily? Pseud 14 (talk) 14:34, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry about not noticing your response @Pseud 14! Support. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * No worries at all and thanks for the review and support. Pseud 14 (talk) 15:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Promoting. -- Pres N  01:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.