Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of sects in the Latter Day Saint movement/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 18:13, 20 July 2010.

List of sects in the Latter Day Saint movement

 * Nominator(s): --ARTEST4ECHO talk, Ecjmartin (talk), Surv1v4l1st

I am nominating this for featured list because, after the implementation of this article's Peer Review, I feel that this List meets all six "Featured list criteria". As this list has improved significantly since April 2010 and I feel that this list now disserves "featured list" status.

Please note that all the recent changes came in response to the Peer Review or from information provided by the "Toolbox" listed in the "featured list process". --ARTEST4ECHO talk 14:06, 24 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Support. This article has been vastly improved, and I think it more than meets the required criteria.  I am also a major contributor to this article (I didn't realize I needed to mention that, but I guess I do, so I am now) - Ecjmartin (talk) 19:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Director's note Support de-bolded as co-nominator's support is assumed. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:42, 3 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Support. The article has indeed made some great progress and I am not seeing anything that would disqualify it from FL.  In the interest of procedure, I will say I have contributed to the article over the years, though I don't know if it would to the level of "significant contributor."  Nonetheless, I would be remiss in not mentioning it per the guidelines. -- Surv1v4l1st (Talk 19:09, 24 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Support. I did some basic work of adding entries to this page some time ago, but anything I contributed has been greatly improved on in formatting and structure. It didn't come close to meeting the requirements for a featured list when I had been editing it, but I think that it does now. Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:23, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Staxringold Items: 1. Added  tag as suggested. See item 1 above as to what is required to be included on this list. Added statement that curches listed must be WP:V - See


 * Fixed?

I believe I have addressed all these issue. If I missed one, or not explained it to your satisfaction, The Rambling Man or Staxringold, please let me know.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 12:50, 29 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Discussion about co-nominators moved to FLC talk page. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:14, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:39, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Sandman888 (talk) 17:13, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Support WereWolf (talk) 04:02, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.