Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tallest buildings in Bellevue, Washington


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:The Rambling Man 06:50, 14 August 2008.

List of tallest buildings in Bellevue, Washington
I am nominating this list as a featured list because it is a well-referenced and informative article. The introduction and content is concise and clear. The categories are easy to navigate. It also gives readers links to the more notable buildings and also gives statistics to the less notable buildings, without any buildings left out of the list. The pictures are not excessive. Instead, it nicely shows the reader the overall landscape and the tallest structure in Bellevue. The quality of the article should achieve a featured list article status.Huang7776 (talk) 05:52, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * With all issues fixed, I think I can support now. Cheers. Trance addict - Armin van Buuren - Oceanlab 05:05, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Comments Matthew Edwards (talk • contribs • email) 06:31, 6 August 2008 (UTC) Oppose reluctantly. It seems my comments have gone ignored. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 08:08, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Rank in the first table doesn't work after 4 clicks
 * Fixed by User:Hydrogen Iodide. --Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 23:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Lincoln Tower One is ranked first, but has no notes.. does this mean it's not as notable?
 * I added "Tallest completed building in the city." Is this okay? Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 23:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Please provide something in the notes column for the buildings without articles
 * It has been discussed multiple times that the only information in the notes should relate directly to the heights of the buildings. I did a quick look through the references for anything that can be considered notable.  I only added a note to 989Elements that says that the building is the first rental apartments high-rise in Bellevue.  Every other entry without notes and/or without an article are not notable and nothing of importance can be added to the notes column.  Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 23:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Even better, create some articles for them
 * Like I said above, most of them are not notable and will probably get deleted. Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 23:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry but I have been busy (but I now have some time on my hands). If there are any other concerns I will try to fix them as soon as possible.  Thanks.  Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 23:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Comment/Oppose A few comments before I support. So, a few things to sort out before I can give it another look and support. Regards. Woody (talk) 22:00, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * "This lists ranks" grammar: This list ranks...
 * Done.
 * "Table entry without text indicate that information regarding building height have not yet been released." have --> has
 * Done.
 * "This lists buildings that are approved for construction in Bellevue and are planned to rise at least 150 feet (46 m)." This should be "...to rise to at least" or " to rise at least 150 feet from ground level. As it is, the sentence (repeated numerous times in the list) is unfinished.
 * Done.
 * "Table entry without text indicate that information regarding building height have not yet been released." should be Table entries without text indicate that information regarding building height have not yet been released. or Table entry without text indicates that information regarding building height have not yet been released. As it is, the sentence is not grammatical correct.
 * Done.
 * "The Bravern - Tower I" This should be an emdash per WP:DASH
 * Done, fixed all instances of this.
 * Can you centre align the numbers in the columns: "floors" and "year." That looks better and is convention.
 * But doing so would make 2 out of 5 columns centered, leaving 3 out of 5 left-aligned, which would be awkward IMO. The convention for building lists, at least, is to leave all columns left-aligned. Cheers, Rai • me  22:43, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review and cheers, Rai • me  22:43, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks good, I fixed a typo, but other than that, looked good. After looking through the other tallest building lists, I see that left aligned number columns is the norm. I prefer them to be centre aligned as it looks neater, but that is personal preference. I don't think columns containing text should be. Either way, I now support. Regards. Woody (talk) 22:58, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.