Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tallest buildings in Charlotte


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted 22:48, 10 April 2008.

List of tallest buildings in Charlotte
Self-nomination. Another tallest building list, modeled after FLs such as List of tallest buildings in Tulsa and List of tallest buildings in San Francisco. I have been working with two other editors, Alaskan assassin and Hydrogen Iodide, to bring this list up to FL standards, and I think it is finally there. I believe it to meet all FL criteria, in that it is comprehensive, stable, well-referenced, well-organized, useful, and complete. As always, any concerns brought up here will be addressed. Thanks, Rai - me  01:22, 29 March 2008 (UTC) Support Wasen't 121 west trade the first non bank building? Alaskan assassin (talk) 04:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Support Another nice list. Criteria met. -- ṃ• α• Ł• ṭ• ʰ• Ə• Щ•   @  20:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Only one mention of First Union is given, when prior to the merger, three towers downtown were part of First Union Center; I unfortunately don't know which of the new ones were the old ones, though, because there was also an existing Wachovia building, so I don't know how the numbering changed. I think these former names should be noted just as One First Union is noted.
 * ✅ -- Rai - me  01:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Except... when they did the merger, there was an existing Wachovia building, I think it was the white and gold one. Looking at Emporis, it looks like I'm thinking of 400 S Tryon? --Golbez (talk) 02:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, you're correct: . I have updated 400 South Tryon's entry to include its 2 former names. Cheers, Rai - me  02:53, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I know there's probably nowhere to put this, but it does seem ever-so-slightly interesting to me that Hearst Tower was the first building built outside of the decades-long bank pissing contest; it marked the first time since 1971 that the two tallest buildings weren't named after banks.
 * Yes, I really don't know where to put that. The Hearst Tower (although not named after a bank) was constructed and is owned by Bank of America anyway... But that is interesting. If you can think of any place to add it (I don't think it would really be appropriate for the table, and I don't see where to put it in the lead), I will add it. -- Rai - me  01:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Is "proposed" only for future ones, not past ones? I ask because Four First Union was once proposed as one of the tallest buildings in the world...
 * Yes, it only for currently proposed and not canceled structures. -- Rai - me  01:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * There's a discrepancy. The main table shows Two Wachovia (built 1971) at 132m, taller than 200 S Tryon (built 1961) at 91m. However, the timeline table shows that 200 S Tryon remained the tallest in the city until BoA Plaza was built in 1974. According to the main table, it lost that title in 1971. Please clear this up.
 * ✅ - fixed error. Two Wachovia is now listed in the timeline. -- Rai - me  01:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * That's all for now. Hope to see this one make it! --Golbez (talk) 01:33, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the very speedy review! Cheers, Rai - me  01:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem, I clicked the moment I saw it, happy to see there were photos, since I had been cursing myself for not taking more photos of the downtown before I left. --Golbez (talk) 02:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Out of curiosity, how tall is Bank of America Stadium? When I've driven through Charlotte, that always seemed to be rather tall. JKBrooks85 (talk) 06:11, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It is about 155 feet (47 m): . So, it doesn't make the height cutoff. Cheers, Rai - me  12:35, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support, there's probably detail missing but since I'm a [former] resident that nags at me more than it should, on its own it looks like a good list. :) now to get around to making an article on Four First Union... --Golbez (talk) 05:48, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Support Great list, keep up the good work. VerruckteDan (talk) 02:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.