Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tallest buildings in Columbus


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:The Rambling Man 06:54, 7 July 2008.

List of tallest buildings in Columbus
Another tallest buildings list, modeled after FLs such as List of tallest buildings in Atlanta and List of tallest buildings in Minneapolis. I have been working in collaboration with Alaskan assassin and Hydrogen Iodide to bring this list up to FL standards, and I think it is now there. I believe it to meet all FL criteria, in that it is comprehensive, stable, well-referenced, well-organized, useful, and complete. As always, any concerns brought up here will be addressed. Thanks, Rai • me  02:14, 27 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Support This looks good to me. Gary King ( talk ) 02:32, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment the fourth column in the Timeline of tallest buildings section reverses feet and meters.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:14, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Cheers, Rai • me  14:37, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment
 * In the lead, link to the appropriate article in "caisson"
 * Done.
 * "Although no Columbus skyscrapers rank among..." should be changed to "Although no Columbus skyscraper ranks among..." or "Although none of the Columbus skyscrapers ranks among..."
 * Changed to the former.
 * In the "Tallest proposed" section, the asterisk note and the note under the "Notes" column are both very redundant. Take out one of them, preferable the one that's under the "Notes" column.
 * I agree, I removed the one in the "Notes" column.
 * Also in the "Tallest proposed" section, why do you use plural nouns when there's only one building in the list? Try this (or another grammatically acceptable variation): "This lists the skyscraper that is proposed for construction in Columbus and is planned to rise at least 250 feet (76 m) in height, but is not yet completed structures. A floor count of 20 stories is used as the cutoff in place of a height of 250 feet (76 m) because the building's height has not yet been released by their developers."
 * Done - changed to singular wording.
 * These are my only concerns.--Dem393 (talk) 21:21, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review and cheers, Rai • me  01:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! Good job on the list! Support--Dem393 (talk) 04:55, 28 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Support Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 02:10, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Look very good to me. §hep   •   ¡Talk to me!  02:25, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Support, great list. Cheers. Trance addict - Armin van Buuren - Oceanlab 15:58, 28 June 2008 (UTC)


 * "fifth-tallest", but "second tallest"?
 * I have added the hyphen. Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 00:15, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * "are being renovated"—rather time-specific. Who's gonna repair it when they're no longer being renovated? As of?
 * I added "in mid-2008" in order to prevent repeating "as of ...". Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 00:15, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Slashes should be unspaced.
 * I am sorry, but can you explain what you mean. Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 00:15, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * "21="?
 * What about it? The equal signs are there because they are equal in height so they share the same rank.  Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 00:15, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Gratuitous table in "Tallest proposed". This type of table should be firmly discouraged. TONY   (talk)  08:25, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I am sorry, but I do not know what you mean by this either. Are you referring to the list only having one entry or that it does not include the height?  Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 00:15, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.