Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tallest buildings in Dallas

List of tallest buildings in Dallas
Self-nomination. Another tallest building list, modeled after FLs such as List of tallest buildings in Boston and List of tallest buildings in Philadelphia. It is slightly different in that it includes "structures", but this is only so that the Reunion Tower will not be left off the list. I believe it to meet all FL criteria, in that is is comprehensive, stable, well-referenced, well-organized, useful, and complete. It contains 8 free images and 1 fair use image, Image:Museum Tower Dallas.jpg, which is used only in the "Tallest under construction and proposed" section to illustrate a future building. As always, any concerns brought up here will be addressed. Thanks, Rai - me  07:15, 21 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Article contains the following sentence: "The Praetorian Building is also sometimes distinguished as the first skyscraper to be constructed in the Western United States". Problem is the Western US link shows a map that does not include Texas in the West.  Texas: think Southern US? Hmains 02:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I have just removed the link. The reference clearly states it was the first building in the West, not the South, so changing it would probably not be a good idea. Rai - me  03:40, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Update: I have re-wikilinked Western United States in the list, as I have recently added a second main image to the Western U.S. page that depicts a broader image of the West to go along with the article's contents. These images are used in all other United States regional articles, so I am not sure why it was left out of the West's article. Rai - me  00:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Support: Wow! Extremely comprehensive and well done!  My only concern is the length of the lede 3 paragraphs, but that's not enough for me to oppose. Nice! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  03:29, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the support. I have also questioned if the introduction is an appropriate length, but I really can't find any information to edit out or move. But I have attempted to model the lead after those of the Boston, Philadelphia, Miami, and San Francisco FLs, so hopefully it is acceptable. Rai - me  21:32, 26 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Circeus, I believe that all of your above listed concerns have been met. Do you have any more? Are you still in oppose? Rai - me  00:19, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Indeed. Support. Circeus 21:20, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Looks good. -- Scorpion0422 06:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Comments, the following minor problems should be solved:
 * The non-free image of the Museum Tower should be removed, purpose of use doesn't satisfy WP:NFCC #3 and #8.
 * I hope I have addressed this (or at least expressed my opinion) on the article's talk page. It passes criterion 8, as a visual of a very significant future building greatly adds to the article and is used to illustrate an entire section. And for 3, I think one image qualifies as "minimal usage", and since there are no free images of any future buildings, I believe it also passes that criterion. Rai - me  23:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The article Cityplace Station Tower (now red link) can easily be created.
 * I disagree. It is a non-notable not yet existing building that does not need an article. Should one be created, it would be simply a mirror of Emporis and be deleted. Rai - me  23:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The image caption of the panorama image should be more descriptive.
 * What do you propose be added? Naming every single building on the panorama would be way too much information for one caption. Rai - me  23:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The subheading 'Tallest under construction and proposed' should be reworded, because the noun is missing.
 * This title has been agreed upon as an accepted title by WP:SKYSCRAPER, and has been used in all other building lists. Adding "buildings" would be redundant. Rai - me  23:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Agree, specifying "buildings" is pointless and redundant. What else could the noun be? "trees"? "mountains"? "statues"?
 * This article should not be linked as 'Architecture' in the template used in this article. – Ilse@ 23:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Why should it not? No other page discusses anything related to Dallas architecture, and this page does. Rai - me  23:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * This is entirely unrelated to the status of the article, if you have issues with that, bring it to the template's talk page. Circeus 00:59, 8 November 2007 (UTC)