Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tallest buildings in Los Angeles


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted 23:20, 16 May 2008.

List of tallest buildings in Los Angeles
Self-nomination. Another tallest building list, modeled after FLs such as List of tallest buildings in Minneapolis and List of tallest buildings in Houston. I have been working with Alaskan assassin, Hydrogen Iodide and Leitmanp to bring this list up to FL standards, and I think it is now there. I believe it to meet all FL criteria, in that it is comprehensive, stable, well-referenced, well-organized, useful, and complete. As always, any concerns brought up here will be addressed. Thanks, Rai • me  20:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Support Alaskan assassin (talk) 20:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC) -- Crzycheetah 21:13, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 *  Comments 
 * If the tables list buildings over 400 feet, why does the lead mostly state facts about buildings over 500 feet?
 * It is because city skylines are ranked by number of buildings over 500 feet (152 m). This is fairly standard for all tallest building lists FLs. But note that the lead focuses just as much on high-rises in the city general, and notes the completion of 30 of its 32 tallest buildings, which includes all of the buildings in the list and not just the ones over 500 feet in height. Cheers, Rai • me  21:26, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Even though there is an abundance of as of May 2008 links in the lead, there's still one "currently" remains. There are currently 21 completed buildings that stand at least 500 feet (152 m) ...
 * ✅, removed "currently", but avoided another mention of as of May 2008. -- Rai • me  21:26, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Support You really perfected creating these "tallest buildings" FLs. I still remember that Providence list and how awful it was compared to this. Great job!-- Crzycheetah 19:28, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Support-I feel this article meets the FL criteria, and is well expanded enough to be considered a featured list, and I found no additional problems. ~   S  R  S   ~   23:31, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Support - Lists looks great and just like other FLs. Cheers.  Trance addict - Tiesto - Above and Beyond 19:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Support This list is written very well, I like it very much. Gman 124 talk 19:09, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Another great list, definitely ready for FL status. VerruckteDan (talk) 00:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.