Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tallest buildings in Pittsburgh


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted 08:25, 16 April 2008.

List of tallest buildings in Pittsburgh
Self-nomination. Another tallest building list, modeled after FLs such as List of tallest buildings in Detroit and List of tallest buildings in Tulsa. I have been working with Alaskan assassin and Hydrogen Iodide to bring this list up to FL standards, and I think it is now there. I believe it to meet all FL criteria, in that it is comprehensive, stable, well-referenced, well-organized, useful, and complete. As always, any concerns brought up here will be addressed. Thanks, Rai - me  05:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Comments Otherwise, good list! -- ṃ• α• Ł• ṭ• ʰ• Ə• Щ•   @  06:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * "Eleven of the 20" looks odd with words and numbers in one sentence. WP:MOSNUM doesn't mind words over ten being spelled if they use only one or two words. Personally, I prefer words over numbers, but the rest of the article uses numbers, and it's not a big deal as long as its consistent.
 * ✅ -- Rai - me  19:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * "(after Philadelphia)" and "(after New York City, Boston and Philadelphia)" needn't be in parentheses
 * Well, if they are not listed in parentheses, then the sentence would contain 6 commas without any breaks (Overall, Pittsburgh's skyline is ranked (based on existing and under-construction buildings over 500 feet (152 m) tall) second in Pennsylvania, after Philadelphia, third in the Northeast, after New York City, Boston and Philadelphia, and 13th in the United States.) Personally, I think it is better with parentheses, as they make the sentence much easier to read. -- Rai - me  19:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Notes B and C could be referenced
 * ✅ -- Rai - me  19:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review. Cheers, Rai - me  19:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Support try as I might I can't find anything beyond Matthew's comments. Well done. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:11, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Cheers, Rai - me  19:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Support Nothing wrong with it but I think is better for the lead than the current. Just because the panoroma gives that same view as the current image in the lead. Alaskan assassin (talk) 20:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Support Looks good, a great addition to the Featured Lists. I also agree with Alaskan assassin about the picture. VerruckteDan (talk) 02:25, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ - Image changed. The problem I had with Image:PittSkyline082904.jpg was that it doesn't show as much detail of as many buildings (U.S. Steel Tower, the tallest in the city, is not very visible), but it is more aesthically pleasing. Cheers, Rai • me  03:40, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Support - list looks great. Cheers.  Trance addict - Tiesto - Above and Beyond 02:40, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Looks great. Nice job! Gary King (talk) 07:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.