Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tallest buildings in Tampa


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:The Rambling Man 06:54, 14 July 2008.

List of tallest buildings in Tampa
Self-nomination. Another tallest building list, modeled after FLs such as List of tallest buildings in Minneapolis and List of tallest buildings in Houston. I have been working with User:Raime, and Hydrogen Iodide to bring this list up to FL standards, and I think it is now there. I believe it to meet all FL criteria, in that it is comprehensive, stable, well-referenced, well-organized, useful, and complete. As always, any concerns brought up here will be addressed. Thanks, Alaskan assassin (talk) 03:53, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Comments Gary King ( talk ) 17:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * "he U.S. city" &rarr; "he United States city"
 * This has been mentioned multiple times. The abbreviation "U.S." is an adjective and that is how it is being used here.  This is similar to the use in U.S. state, Georgia (U.S. state) or U.S. Route 2.  --Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 22:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * "42-story" &rarr; "42-storey"
 * Since this list deals with Tampa, a city in the United States, it should use American spelling. "Storey" is used in the British Isles while "story" is used in the United States.  See Note 1 at Storey and American and British English spelling differences.  --Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 22:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Comments Otherwise it's yet another great piece. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 08:54, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Please let me know regarding image mapping, if you want it
 * Entries 6 and 7 are the same height, so shouldn't they both be "6="?
 * I have fixed them and another set of entries that were the same height. Thanks.  Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 20:57, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

The Rambling Man (talk) 16:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * None of your in-line links in Note [A] seem to work. I would recommend that all other FLs and FLCs which use these links are checked.
 * Also, Note [A] should use text for numbers below 10.
 * Both Done. The problem of the dead links in the Notes section was solved awhile ago by using city lists in place of diagrams, which alternate between URLs and thus are unreliable. I guess that was just overlooked for this list; all other tallest buildings lists already use the city lists. Cheers, Rai • me  16:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Support Another great skyscraper list that meets the criteria. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 19:13, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.