Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of viverrids/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 23:46, 27 September 2020 (UTC).

List of viverrids

 * Nominator(s):  Pres N  23:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

We return to my animals-in-a-family series (previously: felids/canids/mustelids/procyonids/ursids/mephitids) after a couple months with list #7: viverrids, encompassing the 33 species of viverridae split primarily between the civets and the genets, aka the "mongoose-y cats". Unlike the previous lists, which usually had at least a couple well-known examples, many English-speaking readers may have never even heard of these animals, as they're a group of relatively small carnivores mainly hiding away in the jungles, forests, and shrublands of Africa and southeast Asia. As a result, we're missing images for a few of the rarer African genets, and a few others have to make do with drawings. As always, the list format is based on the prior lists and reflects FLC comments. Thanks for reviewing! -- Pres N  23:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Under the common genet, I can see "eg. inland cliffs" - is the use of a single dot a typo? Or is that how it is written in US English (where I am we would either use two dots or none at all, but maybe it's different over there.....?)
 * TBH I think that's all I have - great work as ever...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * - nope, it's supposed to be e.g., which is how I missed it when removing those asides. Now fixed. -- Pres N  20:46, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Support Couldn't find anything — nice work. ~ HAL  333  20:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Support Very nice as usual, nothing caught my eye. Reywas92Talk 20:57, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Source review – All of the references are to high-quality reliable sources and are formatted well. The link-checker shows no issues, and overall the source review is a pass. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 22:16, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 21:11, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.