Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of women's international cricket hat-tricks/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 02:13, 22 April 2015.

List of women's international cricket hat-tricks

 * Nominator(s): Harrias talk 21:34, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Another cricket list! This one is based upon the already featured and subtly different List of Test cricket hat-tricks and List of One Day International cricket hat-tricks. As always, all thoughts, comments and otherwise are welcome!

Note: Featured list candidates/List of tied Twenty20 Internationals/archive1 is still open, but all the comments made there have been resolved, and it has received significant support. Harrias talk 21:34, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Comment "dismissing three different batsmen" isn't accurate, is it? He can dismiss batsmen A and B with the last two balls of one match, then dismiss A with the first ball of the next match he plays. Wouldn't that be a hat-trick? The three main tables should be in different second-level sections.—indopug (talk) 17:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Good points both, sorted. Harrias talk 18:39, 7 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment - You have used fixed width columns, that will not be helpful to users with smaller screens . And why do you need bullet points for the dismissed batsmen? They just look like unnecessary clutter to me. Gatoclass (talk) 17:01, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The fixed widths are so that the columns in all three tables line up, something that people have requested at previous FLCs. If the screen is smaller, they automatically get smaller, rather than force a scroll, so I don't think it should be a problem. The bullet points are simply from convention; they are in both the the lists mentioned above, but also in all of the five-wicket haul lists, such as List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Dale Steyn. That said, I have no particular objection to removing them, but it should probably follow that all of the other similarly formatted lists should follow suit. Harrias talk 12:17, 16 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Support – Good work &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 16:44, 15 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Just out of curiosity, were any of the hat-tricks taken over consecutive overs, or where they all within a single over?
 * I'm not sure; I'll have a look, might be worth adding as a note do you think? Harrias talk 14:35, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * It's not that important, but it is of interest (to me, at least!) The Rambling Man (talk) 08:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Had a look, and found that three of them (one from each format) was split across two overs (in one case, the 10th and 20th overs of a T20). I've added a bit in the table, but I don't know if it is worth mentioning at all in the lead? Harrias talk 14:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * No, I don't think a lead mention is entirely necessary, but thanks for digging up the facts, which turned out to be quite interesting! I now support this candidate.  The Rambling Man (talk) 14:19, 9 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Support now my concerns have been addressed, good list. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:27, 14 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Support - I really can't find a single thing wrong with this. I'm impressed. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:51, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 02:40, 22 April 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.