Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Long Beach Motorsports Walk of Fame/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC).

Long Beach Motorsports Walk of Fame

 * Nominator(s): MWright96 (talk) 16:16, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

The Long Beach Motorsports Walk of Fame in downtown Long Beach, Southern California features many famous names in the world of American auto racing who have made a significant contribution to racing in the city. I expanded this list three months ago and believe it meets the FL criteria. All comments welcome MWright96 (talk) 16:16, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Nicely done! I have one inquiry though. Why not make the "By nationality" heading into a sub-heading? It is not really disconnected from the "Inductees" section. Wretchskull (talk) 22:07, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Support from Wretchskull
 * Done; many thanks for the support MWright96 (talk) 05:33, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Support – only suggestions would be to change "Long Beach, Southern California" to just "Long Beach, California" and to archive sources where possible. Other than that, really great work! RunningTiger123 (talk) 19:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Done both MWright96 (talk) 21:07, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * "to recognise those who have made" - this is an American topic, so per WP:TIES that should be "recognize"
 * "talks with the Economic Development Bureau of the City of Long Beach and officials" - if only the Bureau and the officials were involved then it should be "talks between"
 * "teaching the public on the auto racing role" => "teaching the public about the auto racing role"
 * The three entries for "....Racing" should probably just sort under the actual first letter, as "Racing" isn't a surname
 * That's all I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:19, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Have address all four of the queries raised above MWright96 (talk) 18:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Source review – Pass
Will do soon. Aza24 (talk) 22:55, 5 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Formatting
 * No issues, good job with consistency.


 * Reliability
 * Seems fine, nothing stands out as unreliable after looking through


 * Verifiability
 * Checked 12, 22, 30, 7, no issues
 * Pass for source review

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 21:18, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.