Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Manisha Koirala filmography/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:32, 30 June 2016 (UTC).

Manisha Koirala filmography

 * Nominator(s): Cowlibob (talk) 08:48, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Manisha Koirala is a Nepalese actress who has received four Filmfare awards for her performances in Indian films. As always look forward to all the helpful comments on how to improve it. Cowlibob (talk) 08:48, 21 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Support Good work. Yashthepunisher (talk) 04:47, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Comments from Krimuk90
 * Would be nice to know what her role was in 1942: A Love Story since it marked a turnaround in her career.
 * Her role in Company would be useful.
 * Khela was quite a critically acclaimed production. Some details on it will be good.
 * Would be good to have an overview of how her roles were in significantly less notable films in the late-2000s.
 * Her role in Ek Choti Si Love Story was one of her most controversial, and a court case dragged on for months. Would be good to mention that.
 * A brief mention of her roles in Elektra and Bhoot Returns will be nice.
 * I would suggest mentioning I Am in the lead, as the film was one of her most acclaimed, as well as controversial.
 * Isn't this image much better than the one being used? Krimuk | 90  ( talk ) 09:06, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comments. I've tried to resolve them, added roles, replace image. Wasn't sure how to phrase that Koirala started to appear to less prominent films in the 2000s but gave it a go. Cowlibob (talk) 18:41, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

More comments:
 * "Koirala's career had a turnaround when she starred as the daughter of a revolutionary..." It's unclear what revolutionary? I see the source says revolutionary terrorist. Simply saying daughter of a terrorist should suffice here IMO.
 * "She made her television debut in 2000 as the co-host of game show..." ==> "...co-host of the game show..."
 * "The show did not perform well in terms of ratings and both Kher and Koirala were fired." ==> "The show's poor ratings led to both Kher and Koirala being fired"
 * "During the early to mid 2000s, Koirala's career continued to decline, and she appeared in less mainstream cinema" ==> "Koirala's career continued to decline during the early to mid 2000s, as she appeared in less mainstream films"
 * There's a slight mismatch in the notes column
 * 1) Not sure why "Remake of Telugu film Matru Devo Bhava" is important to mention here.
 * 2) The notes column for Indian does not say that it was simultaneously filmed in Tamil and Hindi, which makes it inconsistent with the other entries.
 * 3) The "Remade in Hindi as Nayak" part of Mudhalvan seems redundant, as Koirala was not a part of the film.
 * 4) The "tied with Rani Mukherji for Saathiya" is better as a footnote.
 * 5) The note for Paisa Vasool should say "also producer" and not just "producer".


 * The caption for the image can be better. Say that it was an event for Bhoot Returns. Krimuk | 90  ( talk ) 03:05, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I think I've resolved these comments. Cowlibob (talk) 17:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

All good now in terms of prose. Some comments on sourcing:
 * What makes Filmibeat a reliable source?
 * The source for Pheri Bhetaula does not mention the film's director. Also for the same film, the role field is blank. Is it because we don't know her character's name or because it cannot be reliably sourced?
 * I am not too keen on the Diamond Pocket Books Pvt Ltd publisher, but I can understand if no alternates are available. I appreciate how difficult it is to source information from the 90s. Krimuk | 90  ( talk ) 02:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Replaced references. Removed Diamond Pocket Book source. I can't find a copy of the film anywhere or any info of character name. Probably the info exists in an offline Nepali source. Cowlibob (talk) 18:20, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Support: All good now. Cheers! Krimuk | 90  ( talk ) 06:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)


 * All my comments have been resolved. So this nomination has my Support. - Vivvt ( Talk ) 18:42, 6 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Support, meets the standards &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 08:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Source review:


 * Formatting: no issues found
 * Spotchecks: checked refs 36, 58, 83, 106 - no problems
 * Completeness: Nothing obviously missing

Passing source review, and so closing this nomination as passed. -- Pres N  15:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.