Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Mayor of Pichilemu/archive2


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:The Rambling Man 10:01, 2 August 2013 (UTC).

Mayor of Pichilemu

 * Nominator(s): Lester Foster (talk &#124; talk) 02:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Last nomination failed because it lacked comments. I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it complies with the criteria; furthermore I have based it from two other featured lists (Mayor of Jersey City, and Mayor of San Francisco). The article makes extensive use of authoritative local sources (Pichilemu News, maintained by a former city councilor, and El Expreso de la Costa, a monthly local newspaper). It deserves to be a FL, please consider this nomination and comment! Thanks! Lester Foster (talk &#124; talk) 02:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Is there something wrong with this nomination? To date it is the only "current nomination" that has not received a single comment. Lester Foster (talk &#124; talk) 07:56, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * There's nothing wrong with it, I think there's a tradition of avoidance in some relisted nominations. Sorry you haven't had any feedback, I'll see what I can do.  The Rambling Man (talk) 16:49, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I tend to think it's more of an issue of people are hesitant to review nominations on topics that are unfamiliar to them. I've had the same issue with List of Sega 32X games still here almost a month later with only two commenters.  That being said, I'll do my part here and see if I can help generate some comments.   Red Phoenix  build the future...remember the past... 14:41, 13 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Support - My concerns have been addressed, and I think this comes out as a strong list. Very nicely done!   Red Phoenix  build the future...remember the past... 02:20, 17 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Support Excellent work on a list that, in my estimation, meets the six critera for inclusion a featured list. The prose quality is informative and professional.  The Lede meets the requirements of the MOS and draws the reader into the article.  It is comprehensive and a thorough examination of the topic (especially with both the list and timeline), and very well-organized. I do not see any issues of disagreement with the expectations of MOS and other guidelines, nor do I see any issues concerning stability.  I applaud the work of the list's editors, and thank the nominator for presenting a well-prepared article.--ColonelHenry (talk) 22:30, 12 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Support: Looks good. I would just add format=PDF to ref 61 – Underneath-it-All (talk) 00:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi there, thanks for supporting my nomination! I have just added that to that ref, and spotted a couple of other PDFs/Excel spreadsheets/text files that were missing that. Lester Foster (talk &#124; talk) 02:16, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.