Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Mexican National Women's Championship/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:31, 18 August 2016 (UTC).

Mexican National Women's Championship

 * Nominator(s):  MPJ  -US 23:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

This list is the second to last list needed to create a Feature Topic on current CMLL Championships (the last one has not yet been created) and it follows the formats and standards of the twelve other Featured Lists I have gotten promoted over the years, and as always this list has benefitted from input received during previous FLC nominations and thus to me represents the qualities needed in a Featured List. I welcome all feedback and will be happy to take all constructive suggestions on. Thanks in advance for anyone's input.  MPJ  -US 23:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Support from the POV of a wrestling editor: based on my review below, all concerns were addressed. starship.paint ~  KO   13:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Here are my comments: starship.paint ~  KO   06:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ... created and sanctioned by the Comisión de Box y Lucha Libre Mexico D.F. - needs a source.
 * Fixed


 * In the table, when you state live event, can you also state the promotion holding it? Because you said AAA and CMLL used the title but I don't know when they did.
 * I will go over the sources and clarify the time line
 * I have indicated which shows were specifically CMLL and AAA to clarify the timeframe a little better.


 * Please explain what is the point of the 1, 2 and the A, B, C in the table. Why not 1, 2, 3, 4, 5?
 * I see how that may look odd, so here goes. I have source confirmation on who the first and second champions were. Champions listed as A, B, C etc. have been sourced as ho!ding the title at a certain time but no confirmation on what number they are. There could have been 5 champs between 2 and "A", or none but records don't confirm that. It would be Original Research to list Rose Williams as " 3" and so on. The lineage is unclear so I tried to not make the list misleading. MPJ  -US 11:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Ohh okay. I get it now! This explanation needs to be in the table Key. Could you leave a note there? Also, instead of A, B, C, D, E, F, G, I would suggest A1, B1, B2, C1, C2, C3, D1. starship
 * I have changed it to your suggestion, grouping them where the order of reigns is known.

.paint ~  KO   12:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * thank you for your input,I will address the last comment after some research.  MPJ  -US 11:10, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I believe I have addressed all concerns?  MPJ  -US 13:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * good. I have made this edit as I believe it is a better explanation. Do you agree? starship.paint ~  KO   13:34, 13 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Works for me, I was struggling with the wording. Thank you  MPJ  -US  22:32, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Unfortunately, this nomination hasn't received enough comment after 2 months, and I'm going to have to remove it to keep the FLC queue moving. -- Pres N  16:46, 17 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.