Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Moons of Saturn/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 19:11, 10 May 2010.

Moons of Saturn

 * Nominator(s): Ruslik_ Zero 12:25, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

I am nominating Moons of Saturn for featured list because, in my opinion, it has reached the FL level. This article is about the most complicated satellite system in the Solar System. It is a very important article for the Solar System Project. Ruslik_ Zero 12:25, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Support. I think it satisfies the criteria. I've noticed a few very minor issues which I'm going to try and fix myself, or point out on the talk page, in the next few hours. ― _ _ _ A._di_M. (formerly Army1987) 15:07, 26 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Why is regular satellites in italics?
 * But irregular satellites is also in italic? Ruslik_ Zero 19:29, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Why x 2? The Rambling Man (talk) 19:43, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Italics are a fairly common way of introducing new technical terms: for example, it's the default rendering for  on most browsers. ―  _ _ _ A._di_M. (formerly Army1987) 20:03, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'll give you that, per our MOS, but there are dozens of "technical terms" in this article. Just wondered why two of them were more significant than all the others.  The Rambling Man (talk) 20:08, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Most of the other technical terms are linked to some other article which defines them and (IMO) the blue already sufficiently highlights them, but these two aren't, because their full definition is given in this article. ― _ _ _ A._di_M. (formerly Army1987) 20:16, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I'll leave this point open until I review the list in detail.  The Rambling Man (talk) 20:23, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Comment - I think, per Layout, external links and navigation templates should come last behind notes and references.— Chris! c / t 06:11, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You'd be quite correct - and I've tweaked the page to reflect that. Also, Support. - The Bushranger (talk) 16:19, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Support very informative. Thoroughly researched. Very encyclopedic as well. Sandman888 (talk) 13:04, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Support. Comprehensive coverage of science in article prose and nicely illustrated; all my comments have now been dealt with. Iridia (talk) 12:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.