Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Municipalities of Jalisco/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC).

Municipalities of Jalisco

 * Nominator(s): Mattximus (talk) and Coyatoc (talk) 16:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

We are continuing our goal of bringing all lists of municipalities in Mexico up to a consistent, high standard (9 states already have their municipality lists featured using this standardized format, along with dozens of other list of municipalities in North America). We have updated the information to reflect the most recent census and tried to incorporate changes from previous nominations. The page should be pretty standardized but there can always be improvements. Thanks to everyone who regularly reviews these lists! Mattximus (talk) 16:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)


 * It's not really a big deal so support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for your review! Mattximus (talk) 18:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

That's all. Solid work. I'll go ahead and support given the above is addressed. ~ HAL  333
 * Comments
 * Is note i written correctly? Same goes with note o and v - not sure the second "and" is needed. ✅
 * I would rewrite note j San Gabriel was renamed Venustiano Carranza between 1934 and 1993. The "between sounds like the date of renaming is sometime within a date range. ✅
 * Thanks for the review! Mattximus (talk) 23:09, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments Support from Aza24

 * I'll be back to do a source review, but some non-source comments first:
 * An RFC recently passed a few months ago asking for captions on all tables (MOS:DTAB) ✅
 * The pictures look rather odd on my screen, on my smaller screen they're stacked 2 on top of 3 on top of 1; on my bigger screen they're stacked 4 on top of 2–both leave huge white space, and looking very awkward. I don't really know what a solution for this would look like, but the current formatting is less than ideal
 * Part of the issue here is this is all happening before the table—a.k.a the main part of the article—creating a weird buffer in between
 * Yep I see what you mean. I experimented with a bunch of different formats, this seems to be the best one for my screen, how does the new format look for you? Mattximus (talk) 20:37, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It's better but still a little awkward—I think the root of the problem is the second, Municipalities of Jalisco image. I see some of your other FLs (though I haven't checked the all) don't have such a map, perhaps remove? Though it is a cool map, the fact that its without labels for the various municipalities makes its actual helpfulness negligible imo. Aza24 (talk) 22:27, 24 March 2021 (UTC) ✅
 * Yep that did it. It fixed it on my screen too. Since it's unlabeled, I agree that it serves little value. Mattximus (talk) 19:35, 30 March 2021 (UTC)


 * I don't really get the lack of TOC; if the vertical one is messing up formatting, why not add a horizontal one.
 * Otherwise seems solid. Aza24 (talk) 09:50, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * This is very strange, I see nothing in the code indicating the removal of the default TOC. I have no idea why it was removed. Do you know how to get it back? Mattximus (talk) 20:37, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I believe articles with 3 or less sections makes the TOC not show up, in that sense I would suppose it's alright to not have one. However, if you're so inclined, you could add or for a horizontal one, simply, add  anywhere. Aza24 (talk) 22:27, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the info. I tried adding the FORCETOC and I see now why the default is no TOC with 3 sections, it looks kinda funny. But I don't hold a strong opinion. I'm inclined to just leave it off as the default recommends. Mattximus (talk) 19:38, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! I have two questions for you above. Mattximus (talk) 20:37, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Just a friendly ping for User:Aza24, wondering if you had a chance to see my two questions above? Mattximus (talk) 22:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the ping! I forgot to add this one to my list to check back on Aza24 (talk) 22:27, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks again Aza24 for your great suggestions! I believe all your concerns are now addressed. Mattximus (talk) 19:38, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Happy to support Aza24 (talk) 05:03, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoted. -- Pres N  22:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.