Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Municipalities of Puebla/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC).

Municipalities of Puebla

 * Nominator(s): Mattximus (talk) 19:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Yet another list of municipalities with a standardized format that now includes 43 (!!) lists in North American jurisdictions. Inspired by real encyclopedias with consistent formatting and high standards, I'm helping to achieve this for lists of municipalities. I tried to incorporate changes from previous nominations but I'm sure I've missed some and there can always be improvements. Thanks for your reviews Mattximus (talk) 19:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

 * Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting + caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting + instead.
 * Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. -- Pres N  15:19, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Oops don't know how I missed that, but it's fixed now. Mattximus (talk) 20:33, 10 March 2024 (UTC)


 * MPGuy2824's comments
 * "Every three years, citizens elect a municipal president (Spanish: presidente municipal) by a plurality voting system who heads a concurrently elected municipal council (ayuntamiento) responsible for providing all the public services for their constituents." to "Every three years, citizens elect a municipal president (Spanish: presidente municipal), by a plurality voting system, who heads a concurrently elected municipal council (ayuntamiento) which is responsible for providing all the public services for their constituents." Done
 * "user fees" might need a wikilink (or an explanation). Done - the wikilink is actually quite good.
 * a couple of refs seem to follow the y-m-d format for dates, while most of the article seems to follow mdy. This should be consistent throughout the article. Done MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * All changes made, thanks for the review! Mattximus (talk) 15:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Ref 6 still has the y-m-d date format. I assume that you'll fix it, so I Support. Pinging Dank, since you were waiting for my comment. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:58, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Comments

 * "who heads a concurrently elected municipal council (ayuntamiento) " - this Spanish word is not in italics, but others are.....? Done
 * That's it, I think! :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review, that was an easy fix! Mattximus (talk) 01:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Dank
Planning to review this, but I'll probably wait for MPGuy2824's reaction (I see they are away until the 25th). Also, just want to be clear that I don't read Spanish, so my review will be more in the nature of checking-the-boxes, and I'm hoping someone will look at this who can read the sources. - Dank (push to talk) 12:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * Checking the FLC criteria:
 * 1. Nothing is jumping out at me as a prose problem. (I've mentioned before that I'm not happy about the redundancies in the Municipalities section, but not unhappy enough to hold up promotion.) I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the links in the table.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 14:06, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. -- Pres N  01:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.