Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Municipalities of Sinaloa/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC).

Municipalities of Sinaloa

 * Nominator(s): Mattximus (talk) 19:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Here is another list of municipalities with a standardized format that now includes 41 (!!) lists in North American jurisdictions. Inspired by real encyclopedias with consistent formatting and high standards, I'm helping to achieve this for lists of municipalities. I tried to incorporate changes from previous nominations but I'm sure I've missed some and there can always be improvements. Thanks for your reviews! Mattximus (talk) 19:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment
 * In the interests of not supporting without picking up anything at all, I would suggest that "Culiacán is the capital and largest city by population." needs a source. The table confirms that Culiacán Municipality is the largest municipality by population, but it doesn't support the statement that Culiacán (the city) is the largest city or that it's the capital.  Other than that, all good! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:01, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Added a reference. Thanks for the review! Mattximus (talk) 15:37, 6 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:22, 7 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Straight-forward Support from me as well. Sources are varied and on-point, photos appear (in as much as it is possible to confirm through brief inspection) to be appropriately licensed. FOARP (talk) 10:56, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Support ... But I have one questions... Why not archive the URL references? --TheUzbek (talk) 12:39, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 * This is a good suggestion, can you point me to a link for how to do this? Mattximus (talk) 14:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 * You can use iabot to add archive links easily --  EN  - Jungwon  16:04, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I've run the bot and it worked perfectly! Is there any reason to not run this on all my featured articles/lists? Mattximus (talk) 19:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * No reason at all! Also note there's a link to the bot in the history page of every article- the "Fix dead links" in the "External links" bar of links. -- Pres N  18:24, 24 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Support: Good enough--金色黎明 (talk) 12:11, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

 * Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting + caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting + instead.
 * Done


 * Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. You're mostly good here, but: the km / sq mi columns need the scope as well, so e.g.  Also, if the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
 * Done


 * Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Yours are slightly off- it needs to be !scope="row", not |scope="row", so that it's a "header" cell, not a regular one.
 * Done


 * Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. -- Pres N  18:24, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * All done, no questions. Thanks for the review! Will take me a while to apply these to all other lists though... Mattximus (talk) 20:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Source review – Reliabiilty looks okay throughout and the sources are in working order according to the link-checker tool. There are a couple small formatting that could stand to be taken care of:
 * Refs 1 and 7 have hyphens in the title that should be en dashes per the MoS.
 * Done


 * The ISBN formatting is all over the place: three formats for three numbers. I believe the 13-digit variety with hyphens is most preferred according to the style guides, but whatever format is used should be consistent.
 * Done

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 22:41, 29 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks everyone! I've completed all recommendations! Mattximus (talk) 18:39, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Promoting. -- Pres N  15:53, 11 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.