Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Nebula Award for Best Novella/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 20:10, 18 June 2012.

Nebula Award for Best Novella

 * Nominator(s):  Pres N  23:10, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Now that novels has passed through, here is the list of Novella winners/nominees for the Nebula Awards- American sci-fi's Emmys. This list is basically identical to the novels list, but with different authors and works filling up the table. All FLC comments from the novels list have been incorporated into this list as well. Thanks for reviewing! -- Pres N  23:10, 30 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Support NapHit (talk) 18:00, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Support with just one comment: This is quite minor, however, and more of a curiosity issue for me, so I am adding my support. This is a great series of lists to see brought to this quality! Dana boomer (talk) 01:09, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * "Novellas published by themselves are eligible for the novel award instead if the author requests them to be considered as such." - Do we know if this has happened before?


 * Image review
 * File:WilliamsNebula.jpg – Who is the copyright holder of the Nebula Award trophy?  Good raise  12:58, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Unsure- I can't find any information on copyrights on the trophy itself. -- Pres N  20:33, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, the File: page needs to make clear how we know that using the image isn't infringing on somebody's copyright. If we can't be reasonably certain, we can't use the image. We can be reasonably certain that the uploader took the picture, but not that this makes him or her the sole copyright holder. Something needs to be done here. If nothing else works, there's still fair use.  Good raise  10:48, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Alright, I've moved it to fair use. -- Pres N  14:59, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, moving on.  Good raise  22:17, 10 June 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Nebula Trophy.jpg – Please see WP:FUR. A separate rationale is necessary for every use of the image. The rationales need to be detailed and specific. Declaring that the non-free content criteria are met is insufficient. It is necessary to explain how they are met. Don't be afraid to write a long FUR; a verbose one is better than one that is too short.  Good raise  22:17, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * How's that? -- Pres N  15:44, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

All in all a good looking article!  Harrias  talk 13:04, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing! -- Pres N  20:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Support looks good to me now!  Harrias  talk 20:18, 29 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Support Agree with all the supporters.-- GoP T C N 16:47, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.