Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Pampa Award/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 09:35:37 18 June 2019 (UTC).

Pampa Award

 * Nominator(s): Yashthepunisher (talk) 20:14, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Another Important Indian literary list that I feel meets the criteria's. All the constructive feedback are welcomed. Happy reading. Yashthepunisher (talk) 20:14, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * No reason for a capital on "Literature" in the infobox
 * In fact, why not put "Civilian award for contributions to Kannada literature" in the infobox?
 * No reason for a capital on "Awardees" in the heading
 * "The award was established in 1987 by Government of Karnataka" => "The award was established in 1987 by the government of Karnataka"
 * "It is awarded each year for a best literary work, written in the Kannada language (one of the 22 Official languages of India) or for a lifetime contribution to Kannada literature by a citizen of Karnataka." - this sentence makes it sound like the award can currently be given for either of these things, but that doesn't seem to be true. Changing it would risk duplicating sentences in the second paragraph, so maybe just combine it with the previous sentence and say "It is the highest literary honor conferred by the Department of Kannada and Culture, Government of Karnataka State, and recognises works written in the Kannada language (one of the 22 official languages of India)" (no capital on "official")
 * "The award comprises a cash prize of ₹1 lakh" - but it doesn't, because later on you say it's been 3 lakh for more than 10 years. So this would need to change to "The award originally comprised a cash prize of ₹1 lakh"
 * " the assassination of M. M. Kalburgi" => " the assassination of the scholar M. M. Kalburgi" (gives some context as to who he actually was)
 * The lead seems very brief at only 1400 characters (not enough for a DYK). Is there anything more that could be added/expanded on?
 * I have added bits in the third para but there is nothing much I could find to add.


 * For what was the award given from 2007 to 2010?
 * Did nobody win last year?
 * No.
 * Any idea why not? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:16, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Probably because of the political instability of the state. But there is nothing available online about it. Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:30, 17 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Many of the winners seem to have photos on WP, could some of them not be used?
 * HTH -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:41, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The rest has been resolved. Thanks for the comments. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:24, 17 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:34, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Support - all good -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:27, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Rest looks good. Great job on this! – zmbro (talk) 22:39, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comments from zmbro
 * Lead's all good
 * Add scope rows and cols to the table
 * A. N. Murthy Rao's image is under fair use so pretty sure it can't be used here (should also be a space between A & N)
 * Images need alt text
 * Got a couple links to fix (some simple, some not so much)
 * So is this award done being presented or was it just only in 2018? If there's going to be one for 2019 I'd add a row for 2018 saying no award
 * Archived the one blue link which is working fine on my server. Replaced ANM's image. The rest has been fixed as well. Thanks for your comments. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:36, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
 * No problem. Two more things: the ref col would look better centered and add a ref that says there was no award in 2018. – zmbro (talk) 15:46, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I hope it looks fine now. I could not find a single reference for 2018, so I had to remove that bit entirely. I'll re-include it once the award is given again this year. Yashthepunisher (talk) 19:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Support – yep looks good to me. Great job on this! – zmbro (talk) 19:53, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. -- Pres N  09:35, 18 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.