Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Philip Seymour Hoffman on screen and stage/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC).

Philip Seymour Hoffman on screen and stage

 * Nominator(s): Cowlibob (talk) 10:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Philip Seymour Hoffman was one of the greatest actors of his generation. This list describes his roles in film, television and the stage. As always I welcome all constructive comments on how to improve it. Cowlibob (talk) 10:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)


 * No worries - support. What a shame this is one list that won't need any updating going forward........ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:08, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Table accessibility review (MOS:DTAB): The tables are missing a caption.
 * Please add `|+ table caption` to the top of the tables, or if it would duplicate a nearby section header you can visually hide the caption as `|+ `
 * -- Pres N  14:38, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Added table captions. Cowlibob (talk) 23:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments from Dank
 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * FLC criteria:
 * 1. The prose is fine. I've done a little copyediting; feel free to revert or discuss. The coding at the top of the table seems fine. I checked sorting on some columns and sampled the links in the table.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. At a glance, the article seems well-sourced to reliable sources ... I'm not good with film sources, but they seem to be okay for what you're using them for. The UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). Refs 16 and 30 need retrieval dates; the other relevant retrieval dates are all present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. The one image seems fine.
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Support, since this is close enough to the finish line. Well done. (I hope you'll drop by my plant list noms every now and then, but they tend to be long, so don't sweat it.) - Dank (push to talk) 14:27, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Support: This looks like a well written career history of PSH. I cannot see errors or glaring issues with this list.
 * --Birdienest81 (talk) 01:22, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoted. -- Pres N  22:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.