Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Pink Floyd discography/archive2


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by User:Scorpion0422 23:06, 26 May 2008.

Pink Floyd discography
previous FLC (19:05, 4 May 2008)

I've been working on this article for a long time now and i think it's ready for a nomination. --Freedom (song) (talk) 20:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Ah please the previous flc debate ended just a week ago. Please take care of the issues before listing it here or get a peer review. Before this is going to be worthy of anything you will have to do something about the references. It's a mess.


 * Make sure you add all information available.
 * All references should have a title, publisher and accessdate at the very least.
 * You should not include "Netherlands" etcetera in the reference, especially not in italic because it's confusing, one might think that "Netherland" is a publisher.
 * Lots of spelling mistakes. (ref 19) You should not write "Netherland", it's either Netherlands or The Netherlands (don't use Holland either). Another example is ref 21. It's "Portuguese", not 'Portugise".
 * There should be no links in the bold title per WP:LS. Find another place for the "England" and "Progressive Rock" and "Pink Floyd" links.

That's a start. Baldrick90 (talk) 21:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note there is no minimum waiting period for renominating FLCs. That being said, from what I can tell, a lot of the concerns from the previous one have not been addressed, and lists should only be resubmitted once that is done. -- Scorpion0422 01:12, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed. There's no shame in nominating it later, once the issues previously raised have been addressed. Drewcifer (talk) 05:44, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Oppose Simply since the majority of the issues from the previous FLC have still not been addressed. Drewcifer (talk) 22:05, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.