Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Pit Stop Challenge/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 25 August 2023 (UTC).

Pit Stop Challenge

 * Nominator(s): EnthusiastWorld37 (talk) 09:58, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

The Pit Stop Challenge is a single elimination, pit stop contest held two days before the Indianapolis 500. It is a "race within a race" for pit crews in their preparation for the race. I have been redoing the list for the last six months and believe it is ready to be reviewed at FLC. All comments are welcome. EnthusiastWorld37 (talk) 09:58, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Comments by RunningTiger123
— RunningTiger123 (talk) 00:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Alt text in infobox contradicts caption
 * Use American English: "practise" → "practice", "cancelled" → "canceled" (occurs twice in lead and twice in table)
 * "followed by Scott Dixon" should not have a comma after it
 * "Time" column should be labeled "Time (s)" (mobile viewers won't see the alt text, so they need a way to identify the unit)
 * Split 2020 and 2021 into two rows for consistency (the current text to the right can span both rows)
 * For consistency, use "Event canceled due to..." or "Canceled due to..." for both 2008 and 2020–21
 * If no external links are needed, remove the section


 * All points have been addressed EnthusiastWorld37 (talk) 08:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Support – RunningTiger123 (talk) 15:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

FOARP

 * I'm a newb at FLC so please forgive any mistakes.
 * Going down the criteria I get:
 * 1. Prose - good.
 * 2. Lead - OK, maybe the criteria gets a little bit lost in the description but that's understandable given that this is both the main article and the list.
 * 3.a) Good
 * b) Good. I AGF on checking every source but they appear relevant and to sustain notability.
 * c) OK, not a fork (since it is also the main article).
 * 4. Format is OK. Maybe would see if there's a better way of organising the "statistics" section but I have not clear suggestions. Could potentially move down some of the text to be a lead for the statistics section to give it a bit more context I suppose? But this is purely optional.
 * 5.a) Visual appeal - OK.
 * b) Photos - the pictures are OK, licensing is OK in as much as I can check it (I'm going to assume the personality rights of Team Penske are not infringed by the photo). Ideally there would be a photo in every section so perhaps you could move one of the pictures to the winners section.
 * 6. No stability issues.


 * I'm OK to Support. FOARP (talk) 09:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

This nomination has stalled out for quite some time! In the interest of getting it off the bottom of the page, I've gone through it myself (and adjusted some wording in the lead) as another reviewer. Source review passed, promoting. -- Pres N  13:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.