Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Radiohead discography/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 15:42, 5 August 2011.

Radiohead discography

 * Nominator(s): TGilmour (talk) 05:20, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

I recently finished working on this article and I'm sure it is of FL quality. I wasn't able to ask the pirmary contributors because all of them are retired. TGilmour (talk) 05:20, 30 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The in-line citations for Australia can easily be made much cleaner by CITEKILL.
 * That would confuse the reader. For example Pablo Honey, released 1993, received certification in 2001; OK Computer, releasd 1997, received in the same year.
 * I'm not talking about certifications, about the chart peaks.
 * How would you appoint citekill?-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫  Share– a–  Power[citation needed] 13:53, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Since I'm on vacation, not able to do an edit always. So to give you a Zen like answer, look at Lady Gaga discography and see how different other chart peaks for Aus have been merged under a single reference using CITEKILL. This applies for the RPM positions of Canada too. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 04:48, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

I'm opposing this list for now as I donot believe this is close to the FL criteria. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 07:30, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * done some things.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ Share– a– Power[citation needed] 16:01, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Comment okay, the nominator has been indef blocked as a sock puppeteer. Anyone willing to take the nomination on? If not, within 24 hours or so, I'll remove. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:28, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I will try to improve this disco. But please give me a week, it requires a big clean up...-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ Share– a– Power[citation needed] 19:59, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Holler at me if you need any help GOP. Thanks TRM for pointing out the socking. Seemed familiar pattern of editing though. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 06:15, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

All issues have been fixed. 50.17.56.96 (talk) 04:24, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Oppose lead only. Needs native English writer as a copyeditor.

Advice: take this away to WP:PR and bring it back once it's ready to go. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:15, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * It doesn't need any peer reviews. -- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ Hey it's me I am dynamite 20:04, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, it does. And I'm not spending any more time on it.  The Rambling Man (talk) 20:06, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I copy edited the lead, please check it now. 188.169.22.145 (talk) 08:05, 5 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.