Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Ricardo Arjona discography/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by Giants2008 20:25, 25 July 2012.

Ricardo Arjona discography

 * Nominator(s): Hahc21  [ TALK ]  [  CONTRIBS  ] 17:43, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because i think it's ready and contains all information that could be found, correctly sourced. Hahc21 [ TALK ]  [  CONTRIBS  ] 17:43, 6 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Support All issues resolved and article has been copy-edited. Erick (talk) 04:18, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

—Michael Jester (talk &#183; contribs) 05:33, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Great work on the article! I'm going to assume all the sources are right, so it's a support from me.


 * Comment Why you say that the m-dash "denotes items which were not released in that country or failed to chart", while you only use them in the Singles section?-- GoP T C N 11:39, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * They were on all the tables, but were changed to n-dashes. Fixed and Thanks for the comment. -- Hahc21 [ TALK ]  [  CONTRIBS  ] 14:50, 7 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Support Everything looks good.  Statυs (talk) 03:03, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I've done a ce of the lead as requested by you, Hahc. Ty. Till 03:01, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks Till. I appreciate the help. — Hahc 21  03:40, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

So, what's next? I think I have addressed everything above. If i missed something, please tell me. — Hahc 21  02:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Support prose issues have been addressed apparently. Till 07:03, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Now as the list was copyedited. Good work! ;) Regards.-- GoP T C N 17:36, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Support. It looks good enough to be a featured list. Good work Hahc :)! — Tomica   (talk)  23:41, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Ref 22 has a dead link tag. I'd be very hesitant to promote the list as long as this is present. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 16:37, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Fixed all but this: No.2 doesn't need a space between the period and the number. The argentinian site was hacked and is dead until they restore it. There's no other source that could replace it, since it's the official argentinian certification entity's website. Thanks for your comments. Cheers! — Hahc 21  17:05, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

So what's the verdict? There hasn't been activity for 10 days. If the CAPIF site is still being an issue, then an archive version of it can be used, right? Erick (talk) 07:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, if an archived version showing all certifications is available, then i think it might be good to go. — Hahc 21  15:01, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The Internet Archive is probably your best bet in finding an archived version, assuming nobody made a copy of the page through WebCite. If that fails, you can always remove the CAPIF certifications until the site comes back. That's not the ideal, but if there's no good source for them there's no good source for them, and I don't believe comprehensiveness requires us to add details that can't be adequately cited. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 21:07, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, I found an archive on the WayBack machine. Before the search option was required to view the certifications, the CAPIF site allowed you to search for certifications by year. Unfortunately, it only goes from 2001 to late 2007 (selecting 2000 does not work). This means that certifications before 2000 and after 2007 will probably have to taken off. At any rate, here it is. Erick (talk) 21:45, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Any update here? I don't want to see this left at FLC forever while we're waiting for the site to come back up. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 20:04, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't found the way to see some years. I will use the archived version for some albums and delete the rest until the site comes back up. UPDATE: Still confused with the archive. I'm not able to see the certifications. I think that, as a complete substitute is not available, then you might close this and then, in a future, i will renominate it. — Hahc 21  20:10, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, [2001. That's all I got for now. [[User:Magiciandude|Erick]] (talk) 23:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.