Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Saif Ali Khan filmography/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 23:03:47 4 August 2019 (UTC).

Saif Ali Khan filmography

 * Nominator(s): Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:08, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

A well written and well sourced list of Saif Ali Khan's film career. Another nomination of mine has received three supports, so I think I am good to go. As always, looking forward to some constructive and helpful comments. Thanks! Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:08, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Comments from Aoba47
Great work with the list. I have only looked over the prose, and I have not looked through any of the sources. Once my comments are addressed, I will be more than happy to support this for promotion. Have a great rest of your day! Aoba47 (talk) 19:33, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I would be more specific in the infobox image caption by saying where the picture was taken. See something like a List of Emily Blunt performances as an example of this.
 * I would add ALT text to the infobox image.
 * I think a verb is needed for this part (and then in Aashik Awara (1993).). Maybe something like (and then starred in Aashik Awara (1993).)?
 * For this part (Khan played the supporting roles ), "the" is not needed.
 * I would add a citation for Sacred Games as everything else in the lead is cited.
 * Since there is an entire section (i.e. Non-Fiction) about how he has hosted multiple Filmfare Awards ceremonies, I would add a short sentence to the lead about it as the lead should reflect a part of every section of the list.
 * Thanks for your queries. They have been resolved. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:18, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for addressing everything. I support this for promotion. Aoba47 (talk) 18:35, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Comments from ChrisTheDude

 * In the photo caption, "inaugural" is not a noun and really isn't the right word to use here. "Opening" would be more appropriate
 * "as did his other three releases" => "as did his next three releases"
 * "leading a setback" => "leading to a setback"
 * "It also marked a turning point in his career" - how?
 * As per the sources, DCH brought a dramatic change in Khan's approach to work and established him as a serious actor. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:42, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I think you need to say that then. Just saying "it was a turning point in his career" doesn't really tell the reader much.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:48, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Done. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:56, 16 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Refs on the first sentence of paragraph 3 are not in numeric order
 * Same again two sentences later
 * And again on the first sentence of the last paragraph
 * Cocktail wikilink is wrong
 * In the TV fiction table, the year is the first column, whereas in the other tables it isn't - be consistent
 * Non-fiction should not have a capital F
 * Note a needs a full stop
 * Hope this helps -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comments. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:42, 16 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Everything looks good. Great job on this! – zmbro (talk) 19:41, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Comments from zmbro
 * Made this edit for consistency
 * Aashik Awara is spelled with a k in the lead but a q in the table (and table one is a redirect)
 * Ref dates for Sacred Games aren't consistent with the rest
 * All done. Thanks for the comments. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:10, 17 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Support – All good for me. :-) – zmbro (talk) 14:39, 17 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Source review – I found one formatting issue: the publisher of ref 59 (The New York Times) should be italicized since that is a print publication. The reliability of the references looks fine, and the sources are well-formatted other than that one item that should be easy to fix. The link-checker tool indicates that ref 61 isn't loading for it, so it's worth a quick check to see if the archive version should be the one highlighted. So, just a couple of quick fixes/checks and this will be a pass. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 22:10, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Fixed both the issues. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:08, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The fixes look good, so I'd say this source review is a pass. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 20:08, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 23:03, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.