Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/South Africa national women's cricket team record by opponent/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by 10:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC).

South Africa national women's cricket team record by opponent

 * Nominator(s):  Harrias  talk 07:56, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

It's been a while since I've nominated a list related to the South Africa women's cricket team, so here we go! I have another nomination open Featured list candidates/List of women's Test cricketers who have taken five wickets on debut/archive1, but it has two supports, and few remaining concerns. I hope that the community will trust in me to cope with the two nominations adequately. This list is based on similar lists from the football world, such as Sheffield United F.C. league record by opponent and Malmö FF league record by opponent. As always, all comments, thoughts and issues appreciated!  Harrias  talk 07:56, 6 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment – "Although the men's national team returned to international cricket in 1991, South Africa women did not compete again until 1997". "the" would be helpful before South Africa here. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 14:20, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I still see this in the lead. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 21:01, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I intended to reply, but forgot to. I don't think the suggestion would make grammatical sense, at least in (cricketing) British English. In internationals, the South African women's team is generally referred to simply as "South Africa women", in the same way as the men's team is generally referred to as "South Africa". If this jars too much grammatically as it is, I think it would need rewriting to something like "Although the men's national team returned to international cricket in 1991, the women's team did not compete again until 1997.." Which although slightly repetitive, should satisfy us both?  Harrias  talk 16:02, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * That would satisfy me. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 16:04, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Ideal. Done.  Harrias  talk 16:15, 10 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Support – Meets the standards. Zia Khan 00:27, 2 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Support ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 14:54, 1 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Support – Good work &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  10:57, 5 April 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.