Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Super Bowl Most Valuable Player Award


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 00:41, 25 January 2009.

Super Bowl Most Valuable Player Award
This is a list that can be found in any self-respecting sports almanac, but it won't be as good as you'll find here (at least I hope not). After a mad dash to get this ready, I believe it meets the FLC standards. It's had a peer review, where the reviewers seemed to think highly of it. As usual, I will be here to address comments and suggestions.  Giants2008  ( 17-14 ) 00:03, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - although their could be some stability problems due to the Super Bowl right around the corner, I don't think it will get much attention that stability will be a problem. I also peer reviewed the article and it is up to WP:WIAFL standards. Go Ravens!-- Tru co  00:36, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - I also peer reviewed the article, and can vouch for the strength of the prose. Stability shouldn't be a problem, as the list is good enough that a single row with the next MVP should be added. Go whichever of the Australian punters makes the Super Bowl! Aptery  gial  00:42, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Excellent list, PR comment addressed, though is there any photo better than that low-quality one of Montana? Maybe a photo of the Pete Rozelle Trophy? Reywas92 Talk  02:54, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think we have a free photo of the Rozelle Trophy. If we did, that would be in the lead, but without one, I thought the only three-time winner should be pictured there. If you want, I can reduce the size from 250 pixels to 225 or lower. Maybe that would help.  Giants2008  ( 17-14 ) 03:45, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, just something better than that low quality photo. No matter what size it is it doesn't look very good. Maybe a photo of the most recent winner, or anything else? Reywas92 Talk  21:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * There are a few free pictures of Eli Manning, the most recent winner. Do any of them look better to you? In any case, I want to keep a photo of Montana in the article. I know some of the pictures aren't the greatest, but that's one of the drawbacks that comes with a free encyclopedia. We just have to make the best of it, and a photo of the only three-time winner should be included if avaliable.  Giants2008  ( 17-14 ) 00:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * See below.  Giants2008  ( 17-14 ) 02:00, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Support I would say reduce the size of the Montana photo.— Chris!  c t 04:57, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Support - Excellent list. On the photo issue, I am fine with Montana in the as the only 3 time winner, but a better photo of either Eli Manning or one of the two time winners may be preferable. Regardless, the Montana photo should remain in the article. Rlendog (talk) 17:18, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Rambo's Revenge (talk)  22:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I put a picture of Eli in the lead, which I think is quite good. That was really a tough decision for me. :-) Montana's photo is now on the right side of the tables with the others.  Giants2008  ( 17-14 ) 02:00, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:27, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 20:07, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.