Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/The Libertines discography


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted 17:40, 21 May 2008.

The Libertines discography
Discography of a short-lived, but glorious, indie rock band. Finally got down to writing the lead after months of procrastination. Anyway its complete, fully referenced, and concerns should be addressed quickly. Thanks, indopug (talk) 23:02, 9 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Support Looks good enough to me now. Noble Story (talk) 02:11, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Support Looks very nice! One last minor suggestion: similar columns should be kept a consistent width among similar tables. For instance the Details columns of Albums, EPs, and maybe Videos should be the same width. Drewcifer (talk) 23:01, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * That's odd, they are already of the same size. Thanks for the support! indopug (talk) 08:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, you know what it is, it's getting squeezed ever so slightly on my monitory. Never mind then!  Good work. Drewcifer (talk) 08:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Just a little comment: -- Underneath-it-All (talk) 01:35, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The album titles should not be in bold. It goes against MOS:BOLD (see discussion WT:MUSTARD).

Support - Added another chart ;) Also reorganized US. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 12:04, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I've moved US back to the second position because it is a very important territory for English language bands, and most people only want to check US and UK chart positions anyway. indopug (talk) 13:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 * WP:CHARTS says home country first, then all other alphabetically. It's not for us to judge which markets are more important, and could be seen as POV. I strongly suggest changing it. -- Matthewedwards (talk· contribs· count· email) 04:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Firstly, WP:Chart seems to talk specifically about the way to format tables in song/album articles (notice the style of table)so it doesn't apply to discographies at all, IMO. Also, asserting that for an English language band, the most important territories are the US and UK, in terms of sales, marketing, promotion, popularity and touring is not POV. An important indicator of an album/single's success, esp. for a British band, is success in the US. Brit bands that were mega-selling (Oasis, U2, Led Zeppelin, The Beatles, The Rolling Stones), have all necessarily been quite big in the US too. In other words, success in the US is almost a definitive indicator of how "big" and popular the band is, making its charts a much more important statistic than, say, Finland. indopug (talk) 17:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I definitely understand your points, I guess I just don't agree with them. That said, I do agree with you in that WP:CHART (at least as it's currently formatted) might not apply to discogs.  So, for the sake of this and other current FLCs, I'll let the complaint go, and see what I can accomplish at WP:CHART as far as making it compliant and/or applicable to discogs. Drewcifer (talk) 23:00, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.