Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/The Simpsons (season 4)


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted 21:42, 23 February 2008.

The Simpsons (season 4)
This time, I've got another season of The Simpsons. I will address any concerns brought up. -- Scorpion0422 19:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Support - now all my comments have been (rapidly and accurately) addressed. Good work.  The Rambling Man (talk) 14:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Support Good job, only a few comments that hardly pass as concerns:
 * The lead uses "show runner" while "showrunner" is used several times below. ✅
 * Al Jean and Mike Reiss, who had also ran the previous season... Who had also run? ✅
 * Several sentences in the Development section deal with crew leaving, but the tense changes to present briefly when mentioning David M Stern and Jon Vitti. ✅
 * "Treehouse of Horror III" was nominated for Emmys for... How about "nominated for Emmys in the categories of"?
 * Should "the Ayn Rand school of tots" be capitalised? ✅
 * "...eventually Homer becomes injured" sounds a little... weird. If you're in a brawl, you don't usually "become injured". How about "Homer is injured" or something less, um, accidental? ✅
 * "Springfiedians"? You'd know better than me, but I seem to recall them referred to in other episodes as "Springfielders". But again, I'd trust you on that one. ✅
 * Good stuff, and I hope the comments are useful. :) • 97198   talk  06:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, and the DVD release dates appear as "Region 1 on 15 June 2004, Region 2 on 2 August, 2004 and in Region 4 on 25 August, 2004" - the latter two with commas - because some setting defaults to no-comma if the year's linked. Is that just my settings, or is it universal? • 97198   talk  06:32, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure. Anyway, your concerns have been addressed. -- Scorpion0422 15:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Coolies, thanks :) And that date thing is a little weird - who knows. • 97198   talk  00:06, 16 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Conditional support
 * It's only a minor one, but I think the table headers would be better in white text, rather than black against the dark blue. -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 21:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I switched it to a lighter colour of blue. Is it better now? -- Scorpion0422 03:54, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It is better, but it's not great. I dunno, maybe it's my eyes, but I still think


 * -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 05:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Support. An exemplary list. great work, Scorpion0422. Qst (talk) 23:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.